Definitely "good" - but there were probably 10-12 better quicks for Test matches at his time. With that said, he was a very good limited overs bowler (espeially ODI), that's what I remember him for
Ahmed's game: Leicestershire vs Kent, 2021
Ahmed's player... :ned: :ar: Colin Ackermann
A very solid middle order option, with handy spin. Ackermann is unlikely to bowl here, but he's the best batting option of this lot.
Others available: :eng: :bat: Zak Crawley, :eng: :bat: Joe Denly, :eng...
:eng: :ar: C. T. Studd for me.
His international tallies were kind of doomed by him batting 10 (for some reason) and bowling as the sixth option (for some reason), but he averaged 30 with the bat - in the 1880s - and 17 with the ball in domestic cricket, which makes me confident he can play in...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.