OK well now Warner has accepted the sanction and will not appeal. Very important that he did so, although he waited until 1 hour before the deadline, but still he's not going to fight it.
He would have been absolutely loathed by the Australian public if he did appeal. No point making yourself...
Respect to Smith and Bancroft here. They're doing the right thing.
Bancroft is young and probably somewhat impressionable, but genuinely remorseful I think, so I'll leave that there. But Smith was the captain, and the one Aussie player I've always thought was different to most of the rest, and...
And the freakin' arrogance of NOT apologising at the press interview. Everything was "regrettable" this and "regrettable" that, but how about a actually saying you're sorry for what you did to the game and the public?
Nah. Too arrogant. Entitled twats that think that they can just admit what...
This is the root of the entire problem. The likes of Dutch, Wealey and co. are doing a great service for a company that doesn't deserve it. But they're not doing it for BA, they're doing it because they love cricket and want a good game like the rest of us. In my view, they're doing the right...
This game is on my Steam wishlist. Might just wait another week or so, watch a few more updates etc. and then I'll almost certainly buy it. The game looks great but they're doing all the little things right too, which is making it awesome.
I didn't misread anything, and I think the 'adult discussion' comment you responded with is a cop out. You need to ask BigAnt why the sliders don't work - bringing in us folk as possibly begging for the sliders is irrelevant and inappropriate. BigAnt have a lot to answer for, and yet somehow we...
Oh, so it's OUR fault? Come on, quit with the self-flagellation angles and start asking the developer to do their job properly.
By the way, the word is "fickle".
Yes. Keep it simple. One of the key areas in which this game failed.
Better to have 3 things that work all the time, than 30 things that work some of the time or not at all.
They tried to include too much. But instead of making the game comprehensive, it actually made it superficial. Does...
I don't understand this either. Doing a quick Google search I find reviewers giving it 8 out of 10 and 4 stars out of 5. Have people's standards slipped that much? The bar needs to be set much, much higher - i.e. to the "satisfactory" level.
Yes, I guess my argument extended into the moral objection to their conduct. Unfortunately a lot of the public won't become aware of this, despite the wide availability of online reviews these days. Many will still just be uninformed consumers and buy, buy, buy... and then play it for a few...
It seems clear to me that by not properly finishing games or patching them adequately, they have been swooping in on gaps in the market and securing a cash-grab.
Spotting a vacuum in the market is a standard marketing tactic, but deceiving and shortchanging the people who pay top price for it -...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.