The PlanetCricket View: A Dark Sheep Emerges

Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Article by AngryAngy -

It is a curious time in India. Year after year, they host a boring series, but this one is possibly the most intriguing boring series ever. The games have all been draws. The pitches are flat. The batsmen have often gotten out in sheer disgust and a bowler has even made back to back hundreds (possibly also out of sheer disgust).

Yet amidst this hazy brown backdrop, Test cricket somehow finds a story to tell. A story of how a rebellious bunch of glorified pacific islanders managed to subdue cricket’s rising empire. A great disturbance in the Force, if you will.

While Indian cricket is quick to associate itself with gold and royalty, New Zealand prefers black, fernery and a cute, furry little flightless bird. The Indian team is a source of religious focus; New Zealand’s a source of prodigious blasphemy.

Yet there are many similarities. Brendon McCullum was a wicketkeeper who gave up the gloves to become a specialist opener. Similarly, Harbhajan Singh has given up spin bowling to become a specialist number 8. VVS Laxman is a superhero; Martin Guptill looks like one. Chris Martin and Sreesanth even share the same Kung Fu master.


Their Kung Fu is strong... (source: ESPNcricinfo)



Following their ODI defeat to Bangladesh, New Zealand were like a man who has been kicked in the goolies by a small child. It hurt like hell, but there was nothing they could do. However, like dinosaurs in a theme park, they found a way. They marched right up to another man, presuming him to be the child’s father, in order to exacted misdirected revenge on his testes.​

While India might be the better team by some measure of ease (at least 9.9 half-asses), they’ve looked very lazy at times. New Zealand have been at their plucky best and have made the most of what they have, even if that also means making it look harder than it really is. This has been all that is necessary for NZ to match India, because the pitches are better laid than the Indian transit system. The question of who can bowl the other side out faster hasn’t yet factored, because they both end up batting too long for a result.

The Zaheer Khan injury is obviously a big one. His wicket taking strongly affects not only India’s ability to bowl out the opposition and win, but also to avoid conceding a huge total and thus lose. They still win games without him, but they are just as likely to lose or draw. This means they would be strong if going into the game needing simply to not lose, but when only a win will do, it puts them in an awkward position. Or at least it should. Dhoni may be keen on 0-0. We mortals can’t presume to understand the world view of a man with that much money. Maybe he considers it a tax deductible charity.

On the other hand, NZ have never won much. A full strength New Zealand should still be less likely than a weakened India to win and twice as likely to lose. However, they’ve made it this far already without losing. If India have found an incomprehensible motivation to avoid winning, then the Kiwis surely have a perfectly sound one. Drawing the series with the no. 1 Test side would say a lot about their consistency and if they give a flying flock about the rankings, it would probably mean a boost there too. Win, lose or draw, they have already achieved a positive result. They have nothing to fear, nothing to lose. India now must surely be dreading the prospect of losing.

And so the show moves into the third and final act. How shall it best end? Surely the only conceivable way out of limbo for this series is for Nagpur to present a proper crumbling wicket that will misbehave. I suppose they could also try to prepare a greentop, but India will go in with two spinners regardless of conditions, so they might as well attempt tactics that suit them. India will finally put their money where their mouth is and if need be, New Zealand will take it (because they’re poor). It may produce a short Test, but heaven forbid we get 2 or 3 days of watchable cricket in amongst our epic tale of good versus evil.



More...
 
Loved the article.

India haven't managed to take 20 kiwi wickets in either test yet, and with their strike bowler out injured it's going to be even harder in the last test.
 
You will never get green wicket in India, forget it. Australia and South Africa have been lucky once in this decade but thats it.

Wonder why people jump on to rank turner bandwagon any time India need to win last match to win or draw a series. Rank turner is best thing that Indian pitches can offer for result oriented game.

Do you see sub continent sides complaining about green wickets when they tour abroad apart from India tour of New Zealand in 2003. They know its what they will get and are prepared for it.
 
You will never get green wicket in India, forget it. Australia and South Africa have been lucky once in this decade but thats it.

England? English pitches often provided green surfaces with lots in it for the bowler. Also the cloudy conditions often help.
 
The idea of a green Test pitch in India is indeed laughable, but a month ago, the idea of India drawing a series with New Zealand was equally so.

I'll admit, a result wicket doesn't necessarily mean one that is playing funny from the get-go, but at least by the end of it. That's what has been missing and not only in India. In a lot of places, it seems the concept of a difficult day 5 wicket is obsolete.
 
The India-Aus wickets recently weren't green for sure but they produced two results in favour of India. You just need your plans to work out but I'd say well done NewZealand.

and an awesome article.
 
Last edited:
I don't know what this obsession with the green is... :D

Both times, Australia stuffed up, but something extra did get into the Mohali wicket, the likes of which we have not seen since. But apart from that, you barely need a plan; it's all in the execution. Dhoni's captaincy proves this. His plan is simply to bat really well and wait for the other team to not bat really well. If it doesn't eventuate, he says "oh well" and goes to sleep on his piles of money.
 
Don't know which captain in world will declare still trailing other teams score when you are batting second in game?

In last 12 matches in 2010 including current one, India has only batted twice in first innings. In all other games they have been chasing the game and I see no reason why Dhoni should not ask his batters to bat well and hope for other side to not bat well.

Last 11 matches:
Batted first: 2
Batted second: 9
Won batting first: 1
Lost batting first: 0
Draw batting first: 1
Won batting second: 5
Lost batting second: 2
Drawn batting second: 2

Won 5 matches despite loosing toss and batting second.
 
I see no reason why Dhoni should not ask his batters to bat well and hope for other side to not bat well.
No reason not to, except that everybody hopes their team can play well. It's not fair to call them all good captains. Captaincy should mean trying to push the other team over, rather than hoping they will trip. In some sense you could argue he is a good captain simply because he doesn't not make his team unsuccessful, but it is more a testament to the team. At international level, captaincy isn't really important because the players are often so effective (but a match on autopilot does get really boring).

Maybe he bowls first, maybe he bowls second. I don't mean that he can only do one and then the other, just that he is rather passive in both. But now you mention it, he doesn't win a lot batting first. Not that he gets to do it much, but maybe he shouldn't, given that his wins total 3 out of 7 versus 10 out of 14 when batting second. Perhaps batting second is favourable because he doesn't have to decide what is a good target. Plus, like I said, there aren't a lot of hazardous day 5 pitches going around if there is a need to chase. Nagpur did prove to be nice and dry, but it was against the international trend.
 
If he has good bowlers at his disposal then you might see that trend.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top