Bye bye Supersubs!!!

aussie1st

Retired Administrator
Joined
Dec 16, 2003
Location
Auckland
The ICC will recommend the end of the much-criticised Supersubs in one-day cricket as well as the launch of a Twenty20 World Championship when its chief executives meet in Dubai next month. The recommendations came from a meeting of the Chief Executives Committee (CEC).

The CEC discussed a general revamp of ICC events, and include proposals for World Cups in 2011 and 2015; the women's World Cup in 2009 and 2013; and the Under-19 World Cup in 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014.

"The ICC has worked hard to provide its members with flexibility in the scheduling of international cricket and these formats have been proposed with the aim of striking a good balance with the Future Tours Program (FTP) of bi-lateral series between nations," Malcolm Speed, the ICC chief executive said.

"These proposals now endorsed by the CEC provide the executive board with the option of including Twenty20 cricket on the international cricket calendar and revamping the Champions Trophy to provide a shorter, sharper event. Both formats could be played in a number of countries at different times of the year to fit in with the overall demands on international teams."

The endorsement of the proposals for future ICC events also means that the process of replacing the current five-year Future Tours Program (FTP) with a six-year program can continue.

"With greater certainty regarding the place of ICC events in the calendar, the ICC and its members are now in a position to continue their discussions over the introduction of a six-year program," Speed said.

The meeting also agreed with ICC management's recommendation that the trial of the Supersub should be discontinued. This recommendation will now go to the executive board for ratification.

David Richardson, the ICC general manager, said that the playing condition was not achieving what it set out to deliver. "The intention of Sunil Gavaskar and the panel of former players on the ICC cricket committee which recommended the trial of this playing condition was to encourage teams to make greater use of allrounders in the ODI game," he said.

"In practice, teams have elected to nominate a specialist player as the substitute and this is placing undue importance on winning the toss. There is no desire to create a situation where 12 players are used to do the job of 11 so we did not support the alternate view of allowing substitutes to be nominated after the toss. The proposal that the playing condition be discontinued has been endorsed by the CEC and will now go to the board for ratification."

If the board accepts this recommendation, the Supersub will no longer apply to series that start after March 21, 2006.

The CEC recommended that the other trial ODI playing condition which deal with fielding restrictions should be deferred to the April meeting of the ICC cricket committee, which is chaired by Gavaskar, before a final decision is made on its future.

? Cricinfo

http://content-nz.cricinfo.com/ci/content/current/story/237248.html

About time they got rid of that stupid rule. Teams should be forced to find all rounders and not rely on the supersub all the time.
 

SaiSrini

Respected Legend
CSK
PlanetCricket Award Winner
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Location
USA
Good news for the ODI's because the Super Sub was giving the toss winning team an unfair advantage!

I would have liked to see it named after the toss, but it seems it did not work out the way they originally wanted it to. So no problem in it being scrapped!

I hope they change the Powerplay such that the batting team is able to choose one block of 5 overs to their advantage!
 

puddleduck

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Location
Uk
Online Cricket Games Owned
Problem with letting the batting team choose the block of 5 overs, is that more than likely, just as the bowling team gets it under way as early as possible, they would still look to have wickets in hand, and then use the last 5 to really launch it. Although using it at different times could force the opposition team to perhaps bring back a key bowler and finish his overs before the last 5.
 

y2j826

International Captain<br><a href="http://www.plane
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Location
India
Online Cricket Games Owned
thats true this rule was in the favour of the team winning the toss, even powerplays dont have much advantage cuz usually all teams used their powerplays in early game so a 15 over fielding restiriction changes into 20 overs thats it nothing else changed much.
 

aussie1st

Retired Administrator
Joined
Dec 16, 2003
Location
Auckland
The supersub rule disadvantaged teams that found all rounders like NZ. Without the supersub, teams will once again have to think about the balance of the team and if a bowler is going crap they will have to find other options within the side or stick with him. Thats how cricket should be, not where you could supersub him off or supersub an extra batter or bowler.
 

ZexyZahid

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
May 12, 2005
Online Cricket Games Owned
I am happy that is scrapped. It just gives an advantage to the winner of the toss. Don't understand why they made the rule of naming SuperSub after the toss, which would change the match's outcome a lot.
 

MWaugh

International Coach
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Online Cricket Games Owned
i dont mind that the supersub rule was scrapped. however if they had of elected to make it teams could name the supersub after the toss i would have been happy with that.
 

James219

International Cricketer
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Location
Sydney, Australia
Online Cricket Games Owned
Yes I partly agree but cricket should always remain a contest of eleven players a side in my opinion despite other changes made to the nature.
 

MWaugh

International Coach
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Online Cricket Games Owned
i still feel that the powerplay should be divided. one lot of 5 overs in the 10-20 over mark and 1 lot of 5 in the 20-30 over mark. rather than just have it all done in the 20th over. its a bit predictable
 

FreddieFan

International Coach
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Location
London
Online Cricket Games Owned
Finally! How good you are replaces the toss as the most important factor deciding the winner!
 

IloveGilly

News Team Member<br><a href="http://www.planetcric
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Location
Australia, Sydney
Online Cricket Games Owned
Still not so happy! Australia were disavantaged on numerous occasions in the VB series against Sri Lanka but i guess it was a little extra bump in the road.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top