A simple debate which is bound to snowball into a pretty long thread here.
For decades, Cricinfo ruled the roost. However, they have been nicely challenged by Cricbuzz over the years. The reasons for such a paradigm shift range from the 'News Credibility, Grammar, Frequency to even the Website/App downtimes'.
I had personally been a Cricinfo user for long. Of late, been seeing that their articles and management are grossly biased towards certain teams and players. Even the quality of writing seems pathetic and seems as though no one edits the content. By contrast, Cricbuzz has shaped up pretty well so far.
What do you guys think?
For decades, Cricinfo ruled the roost. However, they have been nicely challenged by Cricbuzz over the years. The reasons for such a paradigm shift range from the 'News Credibility, Grammar, Frequency to even the Website/App downtimes'.
I had personally been a Cricinfo user for long. Of late, been seeing that their articles and management are grossly biased towards certain teams and players. Even the quality of writing seems pathetic and seems as though no one edits the content. By contrast, Cricbuzz has shaped up pretty well so far.
What do you guys think?