ICC Records queries thread

[Themer]

Not neccesarily I'd say that 95 from 8 overs is worst than 100 from 10

 

[Chewie]

It should be the run rate conceded, given that 5 overs were bowled or something. Otherwise people could hit one guy for 20 in an over and say that's the record. So I'd agree with Themer

 

[treva]

We are talkign about the worst figures. Doesn't matter if someone goes for 36 an over in 2 overs and someone else goes for 8 an over from 10 overs. The figures are worse because the guy has gone for more runs. It's the way it works in real cricket and the way it should be done here.

 

[Themer]

Depends on how many wickets Sureshots man got as he didn't say. If his went for less wickets then that would be alot better.

 

[treva]

Yes but it's about the figures at the end of the day, and my guy leaked more runs. Ahh well, who cares

 

[Sureshot]

Depends on how many wickets Sureshots man got as he didn't say. If his went for less wickets then that would be alot better.

Trego took 0-95 from 8 overs.

We already have a most economical set of figures for OD cricket. Why not have least economical and most expensive?

 

[Themer]

That would be a better idea.