First the good stuff. I like the controls of this game - very nice and intuitive. The depth of options as regards games and tournaments is great. I like the detail of options regarding batting and bowling. Basically, it works very nicely as a cricket sim, which is the main thing when I come to play a computer game.
BUT...
The last cricket game I played was Brian Lara Cricket, so I'm kinda shocked that EA hasn't significantly improved on that old game in 5 years in regard to graphics and basic chrome. The graphics, especially with regard to faces and bodies (the umpire looks like an alien, and the players' faces look like they came out of a horror/sci-fi game) are horrible compared to contemporary games (although better than BLC), and the fielding movements (running and catching balls) are worse than BLC. Unlike BLC, the fielders don't pass the ball back to the bowler, and the whole thing just doesn't seem to run as smoothly as BLC. Added to this, camera positions seem rather lacking, as well as being clunky in terms of movement.
So what's the deal with this game? Cricket 2002 was even worse (I saw a demo and decided I couldn't get beyond the horrible graphics and 3D modelling), with movements that made the players look as if they were trying to play cricket using baseball-style movements, and with 3D body modelling that made everyone look like they had some kind of upper body wasting disease. Can anyone tell me why this game looks like it is competing with the graphic standard that was in place 5 years ago?
All-in-all, I'm happy with the game. It does what it's supposed to and it's playable, but in comparison with the current level of graphical detail in sports games it's sorely lacking. Can we expect this to be fixed in future editions of the game, or is there some compelling reason why EA's cricket games will always lag behind the standard?
BUT...
The last cricket game I played was Brian Lara Cricket, so I'm kinda shocked that EA hasn't significantly improved on that old game in 5 years in regard to graphics and basic chrome. The graphics, especially with regard to faces and bodies (the umpire looks like an alien, and the players' faces look like they came out of a horror/sci-fi game) are horrible compared to contemporary games (although better than BLC), and the fielding movements (running and catching balls) are worse than BLC. Unlike BLC, the fielders don't pass the ball back to the bowler, and the whole thing just doesn't seem to run as smoothly as BLC. Added to this, camera positions seem rather lacking, as well as being clunky in terms of movement.
So what's the deal with this game? Cricket 2002 was even worse (I saw a demo and decided I couldn't get beyond the horrible graphics and 3D modelling), with movements that made the players look as if they were trying to play cricket using baseball-style movements, and with 3D body modelling that made everyone look like they had some kind of upper body wasting disease. Can anyone tell me why this game looks like it is competing with the graphic standard that was in place 5 years ago?
All-in-all, I'm happy with the game. It does what it's supposed to and it's playable, but in comparison with the current level of graphical detail in sports games it's sorely lacking. Can we expect this to be fixed in future editions of the game, or is there some compelling reason why EA's cricket games will always lag behind the standard?
Last edited: