StinkyBoHoon
National Board President
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Location
- Glasgow, Scotland
Another comparison thread, just as you thought they were tailing off.
BUT, I defy you to pull these two apart. Jimmy's figures are worse because he bowled young. I think Jimmy is a lot better with the new ball but unlike Mitch can get stuck in a rut when not much is happening. Mitch always seems to make break throughs even when batsmen are cruising.
BUT, I defy you to pull these two apart. Jimmy's figures are worse because he bowled young. I think Jimmy is a lot better with the new ball but unlike Mitch can get stuck in a rut when not much is happening. Mitch always seems to make break throughs even when batsmen are cruising.