No wonder EA didnt released any demo

[sangam]

yeah its sad but true..EA didnt released any demo of cricket 2004 because they knew the game was buggy and no one will buy it if they get the feel of the bugs

impressive stratergy :

 

[killa_stiky2002]

Yeah, you beat me to it. I was just thining of that. I have a counter strategy that I can't speak about.

(my 1000th post:cool: )

 

[kmk1284]

absolutely

 

[innocentkid]

You know if EA & HB STUDIOS had kept the graphics and controls of 2002 and the features of 2004 it would have been such an awesome game that they wouldnt have needed to make another cricket game for 4-5 years! even the motion capture is pretty good
but the PATHETIC player models, disgusting feilding views, useless replay mode & difficult (if not bad ) controls.have all but undone all the hard work they did for cricket 2002. but EA knows that vey few game companies are interested in making cricket games. so thier motto is
"Hai Fida Toh Aa C***a Varna Maa C***a!"
in short they are slowly becomung the MICROSOFT of the gaming industry.

 

[voy1d]

EA have historically had a history of releasing a buggy game and then never releasing a patch for the game. Possibly because they don't care. The fact is to fix this people would have to just stop buying EA products, and pirate them or something. The only way to make EA realise how poor their products are is by having the people of the world show them what they think with their $$. Because we all know a company can not survive without money.

 

[kmk1284]

yea ea games moh rising sun is a fairly avg game after the 1st mission but its still tops the european chart for 3 cont weeks

 

[crick4life]

Originally posted by voy1d
EA have historically had a history of releasing a buggy game and then never releasing a patch for the game. Possibly because they don't care. The fact is to fix this people would have to just stop buying EA products, and pirate them or something. The only way to make EA realise how poor their products are is by having the people of the world show them what they think with their $$. Because we all know a company can not survive without money.

Don?t we all remember World cup Cricket 99 from EA, they even had the audacity to only fit right handers in the game and geez they sold it for NZ $69 or something. This was the height of bad game production IMO. I have to confess I was one of the stupid ones to buy it as soon as it was released.

 

[innocentkid]

U were not alone cric4life!

 

[oltimer]

they wouldnt have needed to make another cricket game for 4-5 years

Thats exactly what they dont want to do.
Even for Fifa (one of the most selling EA Sports title I think) EA is making a good game once every 4 years; Fifa 99 was the coolest...until Fifa2k3 came, everything in between was crap, so is Fifa 2004.

never releasing a patch for the game

"filesforcrappypatch" Heh heh heh

 

[killa_stiky2002]

Originally posted by oltimer
Thats exactly what they dont want to do.
Even for Fifa (one of the most selling EA Sports title I think) EA is making a good game once every 4 years; Fifa 99 was the coolest...until Fifa2k3 came, everything in between was crap, so is Fifa 2004.

"filesforcrappypatch" Heh heh heh

Fifa 2004 wasn't crap by anymeans. It had a lot of new features which worked 100% properly (unlike c2004). But it lacked the traditional features...like playing a corner short....etc.....

 

[GerardHato]

fifa series in my opinion (sorry guys if you like it) is crap!!! the first one i got was the original on mega drive and that was the greatest soccer game out at the time!! But the last 4 years of fifa has been a real let down.

Anyways back to cricket