pakistan is looking for 3th win

souljah said:
I don't know wut Indians got against Pakistanis but it ain't winning as far as I see it. All this man said is Pakistan will be beating india for the 3rd time in a row,

No has problems with saying that, but the way he said i was the problem...No one can understand what the heck he is writing. As I mentioned in the other thread, it would make for a very good conversation if everyone understood what he was writing.

On Pakistan winning the match. They deserved it, but it was the case of the Indian batsman losing the game rather than Pakistan winning the game. I mean other Kaif and Yuvraj, I think everyone else threw their wickets away. Pakistan's bowling was good, but if Ganguly, Sehwag and Laxman had batted like Agarkar and Dravid did (very sensibly), then India would have won, but credit must go to Pakistan. They stuck to their plan and executed it brilliantly, eventhough their job was made easier with the Indian top order gifting wickets to them!!
 
jawilts what do you want to prove. whats your point fella......... you dont have any clue what you are talking about pakistan beat india for the third time...... in asia cup india did not batted well and lost there wickets quickly. in vedocon the did not batted well. in icc champoins they struggled agian so you are saying that if sehwag or either ganguly or laxman batted well india would have won ............ listen they lost three matches in a row.... jawilts dude three matches in a row make your brian work three matches in a row. what do you indians what to prove now ha that india is still better then pakistan give me a break fella.
 
I was only refferering to this match (ICC Trophy).....We didn't get to see the other games here in Australia, so I wan't commenting on the other 2 games...
the point was that Pakistan bowled well, but if the Indian top 3 hadn't gifted Pakistan the wickets India would've won the match!!!!!!
The way the Indians bowled another 20-30 runs would've been enough.

On the question of whether India is overall a better a team than Pakistan......than I would have to say the Indian team is still better than Pakistan. Pakistan side is still inexperienced at the top of the order and also the bowlers are indiscplined.....every game they give away around 15-20 extras and in this game it nearly cost them as well. (they bowled 11 NB and 3 WDs, wheres India bowled only 3 wides) That is not good enough for a side whose main strength is their bowling!!!! It has cost them games in the past and if they don't improve it will cost them matches again......and in fielding teams are around the same level, probably India slightly ahead with the likes of Yuvraj, Kaif, Agarkar, etc..
So overall I would have to say India is better than Pakistan
 
will if pakistan bowlers bowle too much wides then indian team lose wickets early in the innings. even if pakistani bowlers bowle alot of wides but they still have the strenght to beat a good enough team like india. that is the reason pakistan beat india three conseuctive times in a row. even ganguly said that pakistan deserved to win because the batting line for india is really weak what do you have to say about that if you dont believe me here is the web site to read the article www.cricket.org jwalits best of luck
 
what is the matter with you jwalits you not from india and you still supporting india.
i am just expressing my opinion....... i am telling you what is the truth if you dont believe me then good for you.
 
espnstar said:
what is the matter with you jwalits you not from india and you still supporting india.
i am just expressing my opinion....... i am telling you what is the truth if you dont believe me then good for you.

I was born in India.....and my family has been in Australia for the last 10 years only....

Like yourself, espnstar, I'm also only expressing opinions and what I'm saying is also based on facts that I have read and seen.
 
i dont care who is better or who is not better just close this thread please
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top