Sachin Tendulkar-- The Rocky Balboa of Cricket!

Do you agree that Sachin is Rocky Balboa of cricket?


  • Total voters
    14
Status
Not open for further replies.
It was a 10 round exhibition bout and Dixon fought like that to boost his image. Sparking another guy out couldn't do anything for him, he was already hated so seeing Rocky being KTFO won't do anything for him.
 
Rocky Balboa beat up a black man. If that's what Sachin does in his spare time then fair enough.

When I think of Ian Bell, I think of Superman since he is probably the least probable superhero just as Clark Kent was. Therefore, Ian Bell is Superman and Superman would beat the hell out of Rocky.

Therefore, Ian Bell > Tendulkar
 
Yeah, but Sachin ages.

Sachin at the start of his career.

photorjl.jpg

Sachin now - an OAP

sachintendulkarworldrec.jpg


Ian Bell at the start of his innocuous career

054072.jpg


Ian Bell now

ianbell588796.jpg



In relatively the same career span (give or take a couple years) Sachin has developed into a decrepit old man, while Ian 'Superman' Bell has not aged at all!
 
Two things I dislike about you and Ben ( otherwise you guys are fine ):

Ben: "East or west Matthew Hayden is the best"
Dan: "KP>Sachin"
Anyone with common sense would know that Dan was joking. Why else would he make a thread about the best batsman after Bradman and then pubically state that he voted for Tendulkar?

Kids these days.
 
Wow guys, ease up on the random spam chat. As Ben did say though, it was obvious Dan was joking he knows that at the moment Sachin is much better than KP. People need to not get so worked up :)
 
Well Dan i am confused, You had started a thread stating that Tendulkar is best after Bradman. there you agree that Tendulkar is 2nd best after bradman. Now here you are making a statement that K.P>Sachin!!:eek: Man, You are contradicting your own statements.

max_dillon2007 added 13 Minutes and 44 Seconds later...

Does he? Don't think I ever made that bit clear. I stand firm, KP > Sachin..........;)

Thought this'd be an interesting discussion to have on here. We all know that Sir Donald Bradman is never going to be surpassed, but who do you rate as the 2nd in line? There have been some purely brilliant batsmen in the history of the game. I'm thinking Pollock, Richards, Tendulkar, Lara, Ponting, Chappell, Sobers, Pietersen (:P) the list goes on.

For me, it's an incredibly tough choice, but I'd have to narrow it down to 2, and they'd have to be Sir Vivian Richards and Sachin Tendulkar. On the one hand you've got a man who loved nothing more than taking the attack to a bowler and dominating a bowling attack. Then you've got a guy who's been playing International Cricket since the age of 17 and has gone on to churn out hundred after hundred with apparant ease. To choose between these 2 is incredibly difficult, but there is 1 guy that stands out........

Sachin Tendulkar. He's the leading run scorer in all of Test cricket, with 12,589 runs at an average of 54.27 with 42 hundreds under his belt at a fantastic conversion rate. He's made multiple hundreds against every single Test nation, with the only country he's failed to make a hundred in being Zimbabwe. He averages over 40 in every single country he's played in bar South Africa where he averages 39.76, but he's still managed 3 hundreds there, with the one in 1997 coming against both Pollock and Donald when they were probably nearing their best, Donald was definitely in his prime then anyway.

Tendulkar has made 10 hundreds against the best side in World Cricket, Australia, averaging 56 against them, and even higher, 58 in Australia, with 6 hundreds. Tendulkar's just a genius with the bat, and also an entertaining genius. When Tendulkar comes to the crease you know you're in for a show. When he gets going there's just an effortless, effervescent flow about his game that's unmatched.

So, for me, Sachin Tendulkar is 2nd in line to the great Sir Donald Bradman. Discuss........

Well i think your vote changes like sin wave:p:p. Positive in one interval and then negative in other.:D:D

If your both statements are correct:rolleyes: then
Bradman is 1,Sachin is 2 and K.P is 1.5:p:p
 
Sigh....someone explain, shall I take this one or let someone do it?


Alright, I'll explain, you see sometimes grown-ups have this thing called sarcasm.................
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top