The Fastest Men Alive

cricket_icon

International Cricketer
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Fast bowling has always been, in the eyes of many, the most attractive aspect of cricket. Big, athletic men with long manes of hair, running in to throw down a red or white object at high pace. Speed has always thrilled, Usain Bolt and Manny Pacquiao are great examples of athletes in our generation who have proven the monicker, "speed kills". In recent years, since the retirement of men such as Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Curtley Ambrose, Allan Donald, Shane Bond and more recently Shoaib Akhtar, the game has lost some of it's most iconic fast men. That is why I thought I would post my thoughts on who I believe are the greatest fast bowlers ever to lace on a pair of trainers.

Wasim Akram: Sir Don Bradman once said that "Wasim Akram is the greatest left-arm fast bowler the game of cricket has ever seen". I would go one step further, he is without a doubt the most complete fast bowler ever. He delivered the bowl at high pace from a left arm angle, off a short run, surprising the batsmen with his speed and most of all, cunning. In-swing, out-swing, bouncers, yorkers, slower balls and that most fabled of arts, reverse-swing, he was the master of them all. Over 900 international wickets, with over 500 in ODIs alone, the first man to do so, all at an average of just 23, numbers do not lie, but to look at Akram's career with just numbers would be wrong, he was an artist, may be even a genius, a word so often and so worngly used in sport. Here it fits perfectly.

Malcolm Marshall: Sadly the greatest of the great West Indian fast bowlers was before my time, yet thanks to the timeless wizardry of TV and the internet, I have been able to catch him at his best. Smaller than all the giants that surrounded him, he almost floated to the crease, more a dancer than a fiersome fast bowler, or so they would think, before he unleashed deliveries at sheering pace. Yorkers came almost as naturally as bouncers, in-swing accompanied by out-swing. He had all the tools and the mind to match. His figures of 7-53 against England will always stand out, not just for it's skillfull brilliance but also because "Maco" had to play through the pain of a broken finger on his left hand. Did I mention he had a test average of just 20?

Glenn McGrath: I would just like to say that I like my fast bowlers to actually be fast, supermen who can breach the sound barrier and McGrath never did that. However, when he first started his career he bowled at a brisk pace but soon realised that was not his true calling. He was more a thinker than a builder and he out worked, out thought and out played far too many batsmen. Men who should have dominated a bowler of his pace, Lara, Tendulkar, Inzamam, Jayasuriya, they all fell to his brilliance. He has picked up more Test wickets than any other fast bowler in cricket history, and he did so, with the limitation of not being a true swing bowler. He was not quite the greatest but I will never forget his haul of 23 wickets in the 2007 World Cup, a time when all the experts said "he no longer has it".

Imran Khan: His an allrounder, I hear you say but his fast bowling was always his piece de resistance. Menacing, athletic, nimble, beautiful, dangerous and ever so effective, he was a bowler with a Test average of just 22 with over 300 wickets. This belies his most important attribute, the ability to take wickets when it really mattered. Before him reverse swing was a myth, with him it became an art form which he passed on to his prodigies, Wasim and Waqar, who then taught it to the world. A pioneer in every sense of the word and a World Cup winning captain. Oh, and how can anyone forget, his bowling was crucial to Pakistan drawing three Test series' with the West Indies at a time when the caribbean islands ruled cricket with an iron fist.

Micheal Holding: Whispering death was quite possibly the most aesthetically pleasing bowler of his, or any other generation. He was deadly with the new and old ball, and at his peak as fast as anyone who has ever played the game. He ran into ball with a smooth, almost flawless run, mesmeric in his approach, the snake charming the charmer. That famous over at the Oval against Geoffrey Boycott will always be remembered for its sheer, brutal pace. Fast, no other word remains to describe him.

Dennis Lillee: If fast bowlers are meant to have long, ferocious manes, unruly facial hair and a heart stopping glare, then Lillee was a fast bowler. But, he was more than that, he could swing the ball late, at high speed and ever so accurately. His deliveries could sometimes resemble scud missiles, so it is no wonder he is considered by many as the most iconic fast bowler of all time. His death dealing spells against England will never be forgotten and I hear that retired English batsmen still wake up in sweats. The most menacing of Australia's fast bowlers, even if not it's most elegant. We need more like Dennis Lillee but sadly he is the type to only come once.

Curtly Ambrose: I grew up watching a West Indian team in an inevitable but sad decline, yet Ambrose still managed 405 Test wickets at an average of only 20.99, while all around him, new West Indian fast men came and went. Courtney Walsh was often his partner in crime but Wals could never match up to the force and guile of Ambrose's spells. 7-1 anyone? That first delivery against Atherton in Port-of-Spain? And has anyone made Tendulkar feel as uncomfortable at the crease? Curtly Ambrose was big and clever.

Fred Trueman: England's greatest bowler and one of the fastest to ever put on the whites of Test cricket. There is not much of Trueman that fans of my generation can see but his statistics are gigantic enough to earn him a place on this list. He picked up 307 wickets in just 67 tests, the first bowler ever to cross the magical 300 and he did it all with an outstanding average of just 21.57. In his Test debut, he took 8-31 against India and never looked back. He was possibly not as quick as he would have had you believe but he was fast enough. An icon of his time.

Allan Donald: The 1990s was a great time for fast bowlers and an even better time for a young cricket fan to be growing up in. It was a time for change and reconciliation, with Allan Donald leading the South African pace attack into a new era. White lightning was a fiersome competitor, a cricketer blessed with skill and talent and a true gentleman outside of the game. Phenomenal averages coupled with hundreds of wickets were not all that made him so important to South Africa, it was the way he carried himself and how he used his bowling to once again make his nation a force in cricket.

Joel Garner: "Big Bird" is statistically unbelievable and aesthetically frightening. At his peak he had possibly the most lethal yorker in the sport, delivered from a height of more than 10 feet, not many batsmen saw it coming. He was not as skilled as Akram, or as fast as Holding but he could make the ball sing when he wanted to. Fast, accurate, dangerous and a true wicket taker, a brilliant, never been beaten 5-38 in a World Cup final is testament to his greatness.

Thank you to anyone who has taken some time out to read this. Comments and may be ur own lists of fav fast bowlers would be appreciated.
 
really good post, but I'm always a bit dubious of this "delivered from 10 feet thing" people say about garner. Fast bowlers don't release the ball from a jump, their bodies are actually a bit lower than standing height, as you see on any no ball replay. front leg stretched out, add to that, ok, garner was 6'8 at the most, the bit of your arm that's above your head is only from the elbow up, so unless Garners arms were the same length as his body, there's no way it was anywhere near 10 feet.
 
Frank Tyson didn't play many Tests, but he left an impression, regarded by his contemporaries as the fastest bowler ever. The 54-55 Ashes were rather owned by this young tearaway, who robbed Fred Trueman of a spot on the tour by breaking Bill Edrich's jaw in a county match. He bowled off an enormous 40 yard run with a fast arm and a jarring follow-through that said everything, although he soon found 20 yards was sufficient in the hot Australian summer. England left with the Ashes and capped their tour off in New Zealand, which resulted in the infamous innings of 26; Tyson himself scored 27 not out in the 2nd innings to ensure England did not bat again, as Len Hutton had eerily foretold. The Typhoon took 50 wickets in just 9 Tests, but he did not make it to 100, as injuries took their toll. He retired at just 30, but re-established himself in Australia as a prolific cricket writer, commentator and coach.
 
Waqar Younis should be right up there. His strike rate of 42 makes him one of the top ten IMHO. Wasim Akram however is the bowlers I have enjoyed watching the most. He and Shane Warne were always a treat to watch. Many a time I would only watch a Pak match to see the two W's operate with the ball. I wish I had seen a lot of Marshall and other members of West Indian Fast bowling line up. Another bowler that used to thrill me was Gillespie. I can never forget his terrifying spell against Lara in a test in Australia. He was bowling closer and over 150 KPH and finally had the great man bowled if my memory serves me right.
 
yeah maybe a little exaggeration on my part about garner but the man was most definitely a giant. waqar, lee and akhtar just missed a spot in my top 10.
 
Lillee
Marshall
Imran
Hadlee
Akram
McGrath
Trueman
Donald
Ambrose
Lindwall/Waqar
 
yeah maybe a little exaggeration on my part about garner but the man was most definitely a giant. waqar, lee and akhtar just missed a spot in my top 10.

wasn't your exaggeration I was really talking about, it seems to be just one of those things people say now. Any mention of Garner's bowling and this "from 10 feet" thing comes out.

brand new article in cricinfo today, and there it is

ESPNcricinfo XI: Some of the tallest players to play international cricket | Regulars | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo

just shows you, repeat something often enough and even if it's blatantly impossible then people will start believing it without questioning it.
 
Going from the point of "being taller makes you quicker" (something like that) Then Mohammed Irfan should be quickest bowler at the moment. But he's not. Tait SURELY ??
 
It's rather the opposite, that if you're gigantic, you can probably afford to be a little slow. Garner wasn't that quick, but was as destructive as any express bowler in his era.

I agree about the 10 foot myth, but would have to say it was probably still up to 8 feet. He just had an enormous arm.
 
It's rather the opposite, that if you're gigantic, you can probably afford to be a little slow. Garner wasn't that quick, but was as destructive as any express bowler in his era.

A lot of what I've seen of Garner isn't that quick. However, I have no doubt that he could crank it up toward the death of an ODI innings or in another situation where it is desirable to get the ball down as quick as possible. This is the same for a few tall bowlers, they tend to bowl at fast-medium but just have the ability to slip into another gear if the moment calls. Harmison could bowl extremely fast but mainly remained at around 85mph most of the time, Tremlett is probably a better example. He bowls close to 82mph but I have seen him bowl over 90mph at times.

I think that the absolute giants do not have the coordination that shorter people have. However, there is the obvious advantage that longer arms means longer levers which means more pace. I recall reading Bob Willis writing that around 6ft 6 is the rough point to which coordination starts to go downhill which balances things out a bit regarding the advantage of longer levers. A lot of quick bowlers are very tall, but once you get to the territory of Harmison, Garner or Tremlett - then the pace starts to be a bit less consistent.

----------

Going from the point of "being taller makes you quicker" (something like that) Then Mohammed Irfan should be quickest bowler at the moment. But he's not. Tait SURELY ??

Height obviously does not equal pace. Technique plays a massive part. As mentioned earlier, I believe extreme height can play a disadvantage regarding speed. Not a big disadvantage, because long levers is a big advantage. A lot of quick bowlers are deceptively tall though. Tait may look small, but he is a big dude. His official website lists him at 6ft 4.

Looking at the all time quick bowlers of recent times...

Tait: 6ft 4
Lee: 6ft 1
Akhtar: 5ft 11 (he is helped a lot by hypermobile joints though)
Lillee: 5ft 11.5
Thomson: Looks 5ft 11
Holding: 6ft 3.5
Roberts: 6ft 2

...So there definitely seems to be a range of 5ft 10 to 6ft 4 which is similar to what Bob Willis listed in his book when he was talking about the ideal height to be a truly quick bowler. However, when you look at people who can bowl at 145kph (rather than the above who were 150-155kph merchants in their prime), the height can vary upwards to a Joel Garner at 6ft 8. However, you don't tend to see many people under 5ft 10 with much speed. Even Malcolm Marshall, often viewed as a small man, is listed by Wikipedia at 5ft 11 inches.
 
Last edited:
just wana add in mohammed sami. when he first came in he was truely EXPRESS!! side by side with akhtar for a while. and i think he was only 5'9''. not sure about it though.
 
the reason you dont see any bowlers below 5foot 11 or so is because when you're a short arse like me, you dont generate as much bounce. so shorter people tend not to become fast bowlers as it is harder to get wickets simply because you are missing one of the aspects that fast bowlers strive for. when i was coached, i was told to either become a spinner, or focus on medium pace at the death type bowling. im 5 foot 11 as well. many people my height are coached away from fast bolwing at a youngish age, so thats why you dont see many shorter fast bowlers.
 
Waqar Younis is 5 11 and look what he became. 5 11 is a good enough height. Short height bowlers can use the skid factor to their advantage. They do not get many edges or wickets of short ball but they will get a lot more bowled/lbws if they bowl wicket to wicket.
 
You actually do see a lot of shorter bowlers, or at least ones who don't have a particular height advantage. There are quite a few like Steyn, Lee, Anderson or Zaheer; fast bowlers who are maybe just a little bigger than average, but not enough that they are noted for their extra bounce or considered 'hit the deck' style bowlers.

But beyond that there have certainly been some much shorter bowlers of note like Kemar Roach, Lasith Malinga and Makhaya Ntini.

I guess it goes without saying that coaches have a lot to answer for. Height plays a part, but often isn't a defining factor for cricketers and especially not for a teenager who is still growing. Above all else, you can't magically give someone ability. Most of us will never be good cricketers, no matter what. Coaches should exist to encourage players to find their strengths, but also empower their charges to make their own decisions, because that's all that matters in the field.
 
^ very good point. too many coaches, especially here in england try and mould a player into what they like rather than encouraging a little bit of "rawness".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top