Not really, other than you lynched El Loco not in contrast with the role claim.Not really, other than you lynched El Loco not in contrast with the role claim. (initially when you role claimed)
FP did run after me with same words and what I can say from that is, it's intentional to get some information from other side about faking the role. (I was mafia the previous game)
If you observe other posts between mine, you will surely find why I ticked Villain as town. The only thing I did was waited for others to react and then see whether that was fake claim.
I lynched him on occasion of not finding anything which is worth considering. And I unlynched based on how he responded about role claim.
And most of your posts are negative about me, trying to find something.
:bat: Sam Hain
:bat: Rilee Rossouw
:bat: James Vince
:bat: Liam Livingstone
:wk: Sam Billings
:ar: Darren Stevens
:ar: Liam Dawson (6th bowler)
:ar: Kyle Abbott
:bwl: Gareth Berg
:bwl: Chris Jordan
:bwl: Matt Coles
Italic - to bowl
Bold - changes
True, but you are missing the point of Villain disclosing. He had to because there is not other way to back his defense, when people are going against.
What are you implying? I was convinced with that role claim, even though I thought he was giving scum vibes initially.
The way you responded...
You really think it was valid to go after, though villain disclosed his role? Could have gone the same with Rudolph, but he chose not to.
Villain unwillingly created? That doesn't make sense. Are you covering asprin by any chance?
Through the manner you approached his post, it seemed deliberate if you ask me. Not to wipe slate clean, but you could have waited for counter claim.
I don't want to string up bearing in mind how you rendered in the previous game.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.