Search results

My problem is with how long it is taking to deliver the promise of co-op. I'm almost certain that NO ONE thought it would take more than a year to fulfil a promise that they made. So I stand by my feeling that I made no mistake in thinking co-op would have been added to consoles earlier than...

I wouldn't blame you for complaining if the feature was promised and came from the developer of the game.

I made no mistake. No reasonable person would think Big Ant's promise would take 15+ months to be delivered. To see what is essentially "we didn't say when" comments coming out is saddening to see. Let's refer back to this comment by Big Ant, "We have had to remove the co-op play from Patch#2 as...

My complaint is the 15 months it's taken and still going to deliver a promise of something as simple as co-op. And yes, it's obviously Big Ants fault for taking this long.

The promise of co-op came directly from BigAntStudios, so I AM owed that by the developer. Now re-read my last comment addressed to you. We are both repeating ourselves and going around in circles.

No no no. Look, when I bought the PS3 version, it could potentially have been before the time when the co-op was promised. I then saw a PS4 version coming out, by which time the co-op had already been promised. I DID NOT think PS4 was getting co-op before PS3. I stopped playing the PS3 version...

I didn't want to imply that I thought co-op was already added into the PS4 version, I meant that by the time I had bought the PS4 version, it had been promised that co-op would be added into the game in the future. And to clarify, I don't think anyone else thought I implied that (incase you...

It makes total sense. They promised it would be added in the game. Therefore I bought the game with the expectation that co-op would be added. Just attempt to get that in your head. If you let go of your bias for just one second, you'd understand that people would inevitably be lured into buying...

Uncertain when exactly I bought the PS3 version but by the time I bought the PS4 version, it was made clear that co-op would be added to the game through patch 3. Hence, I bought the game expecting co-op to be added. Not exactly crazy to think.

That is also all I want in a cricket game. Crazy to think I bought both PS3 and PS4 versions expecting co-op, and more than a year later, I'm still waiting. Why such a seemingly simple yet crucial addition to the game didn't take precedence and wasn't added as soon as possible perplexes me.

Well that sort of premeditation (the first one of the two described by me) I don't think can be achieved in game, in my experience anyways. I wouldn't want them to. In any case, he didn't (at least I think he didn't) want to abandon the current control scheme, but to have the option of...

There you go. Tbh, your comments below to me had elements of mocking in it (not that I mind nor would you care if I did mind), "Circles, hold hands?" and "(not all, just to help you out here)". Ah, so showing me that a player premeditated an attacking shot to a specific section of the boundary...

Aggressive shots though aren't almost always premeditated. Hooking and pulling can very often be instinctual shots which requires no premeditation. Uppercutting the ball over slips/gully is another non premeditated aerial shot. Pulling spinners who bowl half trackers for six, non premeditated...

"If an ‘out’ decision is being reviewed, in order to report that the point of impact is not between wicket and wicket (i.e. outside the line of the stumps), the evidence provided by technology should show that no part of the ball at the moment of interception is between wicket and wicket."...

I would have thought the point was that a bowler shouldn't be bowling at an exact speed down to 1 decimal point 99% of the time.

I still think for the average person it shouldn't be so hard to pre-meditate. Especially on Veteran mode, I can play the ball on it's merit to pace bowlers to a very very small extent but even then I never time anything if I try this. In any case, the point also is that there is no point...

Our true rivalry lies in the Fifa football games. We do play vs sometimes, but it tends to become a bit unrealistic and annoying. We almost exclusively use spinners mixing up 30mph deliveries drifting the ball massively along with quicker ones. So difficult to bat against! I've had so many LBWs...

I would rather have got co-op on top of patch 2.5. The 1+ year wait is simply too long. I remember buying the PS3 version and keenly awaiting co-op within a month or two so I could play with my brother and others and get the true experience of running between the wickets and not having to pass...

So would you say it's reasonable for me to feel so frustrated at the fact that co-op still hasn't come to consoles? Co-op should have taken priority ahead of the patches released so far for consoles. You made a promise, and although you could technically wait another 20 years to deliver this...

He wants: - Team career mode rather than only being able to play a player career - An overall rating for a player - Spinners being able to spin the ball more - Improves bounce of the ball for bowlers so it carries to the keeper more often - Reduced ability of fielders so quick singles off...