Back to C2004

Also the worst thing about c2k4 was the dynamic field settings. I really mean this ,
they set deep mid wicket just after 5-6 overs if you hit few balls to the fance even in early in your inning. This is just in test match cricket.
And in ODIs you hit 6 balls in an over to different parts and you will see field setting gets changed after every ball.Rediculous!!
Have you ever seen dip mid wicket to Mcgrath in test matches??
In dreams. but in c2k4 its reality.
 
Cricket 2005, is much better than 2004, although the bugs remain, its better.
 
exactly still somehow EA sucks in cricket making i hope they make a good officialy licensed world cup game in 2007
 
HB Studios currently have three games in development: Rugby 06; FIFA Street 2 and an unnamed title that I believe is Cricket 06. The graphics betwen Rugby and Cricket always seem to be shared so we could be seeing wrestlers again. Remember that EA SPORTS have the licence for England, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand. Hopefully they can expand on that.
 
SkateBoarder said:
HB Studios currently have three games in development: Rugby 06; FIFA Street 2 and an unnamed title that I believe is Cricket 06. The graphics betwen Rugby and Cricket always seem to be shared so we could be seeing wrestlers again. Remember that EA SPORTS have the licence for England, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand. Hopefully they can expand on that.
They really need to get the licence for sub-continent teams. The sub-continent players look plumbers in cricket 2005.
Thanks to our patch makers though.:onpc
 
I now play Cricket 2004 again. I agree with all of your bullet points. In a test match as England against Pakistan at the Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore, it became increasingly darker during the first day and gently began to rain after lunch. Marcus Trescothick played some beautiful shots to make an enjoyable half century. Cricket 2005 is extremely poor.
 
Rocky said:
How many of you are going back to c2004? Well today I thought much about it and I'm going back to c2004. I have strong reasons for this conclusion-
C2004 has
*real,really real weather effects
*more shots selection than c2005
*more stadiums than c2005 (and they are not small as c2005)
*it is more enjoyable than c2005

i think ur right. i still play that game
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top