Post Line-ups Champions League XX - Round 1 - It's time to give the people what they need, not what they want...

[Biggy]

So you kept it at 3 international players. Not liking that but whatever.

That makes no sense, don't all the teams use 4?

 

[BKB1991]

That would have been the general idea.

 

[Chewie]

That makes no sense, don't all the teams use 4?

NZPL and AfPL use 5

 

[Biggy]

NZPL and AfPL use 5

I knew NZPL used 5, but no one uses 3 so let common sense prevail? Come on Rahul. I have 12 teams so the talent is really spred out and to only play 3 internationals is stupid.

 

[Iridium]

NZPL and AfPL use 5

I allowed 5 internationals in CL4.

I knew NZPL used 5, but no one uses 3 so let common sense prevail? Come on Rahul. I have 12 teams so the talent is really spred out and to only play 3 internationals is stupid.

Also it disadvantages those leagues who base their team structure around a set number of international players (whether it be 4 or 5). Like my WstnPL team had 5 internationals and I've had to cut 2 out and replace them with fringe domestic players, weakening my team.

 

[CG123]

bcvs' team (the NZPL team I'm managing) only has two New Zealand batsmen, so with only three overseas players it's more or less impossible to play an overseas bowler, as you have to play the two New Zealand batsmen, then three overseas batsmen, otherwise Franklin/Vettori will be batting at 5/6.

It's a pretty big difference going down from 5 -> 3.

 

[WubbaLubbaDubDub]

Ohk then.. I don't mind you all playing 4 overseas player. Change your lineup then actually had something in mind like 4 overseas from the Semi Final stage and really wanted all domestic talent to come out as I said earlier but I don't have any issue if managers want 4 overseas player..

Go ahead change your lineup

 

[CG123]

Sweet.

BTW on the first post you've got Swann down in one team as a bowler, and in another team as an AR, and you've got Ryder down in bcvs' team as a batsman, and in another team as an AR.

I advice you base these on your ratings, e.g. if someone's batting rating is above 'x', then I'll class him as an AR, and if someone's bowling rating is below 'y', then I'll class him as an AR, at least that's what I think is the best way to class players on the first post.

 

[WubbaLubbaDubDub]

I have based down as how they play for ygr particular county he will still bowl and bat but based on what the team needs he has been rated and put down

 

[Biggy]

I have based down as how they play for ygr particular county he will still bowl and bat but based on what the team needs he has been rated and put down

Can I have a look at your files? Just interested to see how you rate them.

 

[CG123]

I have based down as how they play for ygr particular county he will still bowl and bat but based on what the team needs he has been rated and put down

So are both of the Swann's and both of the Ryder's still rated EXACTLY the same?

 

[WubbaLubbaDubDub]

Can I have a look at your files? Just interested to see how you rate them.

For sure I will send you by tonight as currently at University

 

[CG123]

Can you please answer my question?

 

[WubbaLubbaDubDub]

So are both of the Swann's and both of the Ryder's still rated EXACTLY the same?

More or less depending upon the team combination

 

[Dipak]

^Graeme Swann is Greame Swann for whichever team he plays. I don't think that his skills are more/less when he plays for England/Notts. So I thinkt hat the rating of the players should be same whichever team they play.