Culli's Graphics Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 13648
  • Start date

What do you think of my sigs?

  • Very Good

    Votes: 22 52.4%
  • Quite Good

    Votes: 14 33.3%
  • Average

    Votes: 5 11.9%
  • Poor

    Votes: 1 2.4%

  • Total voters
    42
I'm saying they're bollocks, and why quote me from ages ago?!
 
!x!Culli!x! said:
I'm saying they're bollocks, and why quote me from ages ago?!

Lmao wow your hard mate saying mine are bollocks when i started out a couple of weeks ago and thought i liked you alot so i would post some up and i did and all i did to you was say " He has spelt Andriy wrong" but no offence but you are insane as your sig was bullocks. So look in the mirror :mad :mad
 
1. Spell 'bollocks' right, not 'bullocks'
2. There's criticism and then there's actually looking for a fault. You did the latter.
 
!x!Culli!x! said:
Andriy Shevchenko sig;

Shevchenkosig.jpg

A nice signature there Stu :clap Keep up the good work! :cool:
 
!x!Culli!x! said:
1. Spell 'bollocks' right, not 'bullocks'
2. There's criticism and then there's actually looking for a fault. You did the latter.

So your saying you are better than me and you are allowed to spell things wrong and i aren't? :mad:
 
Jaztheman said:
So your saying you are better than me and you are allowed to spell things wrong and i aren't? :mad:

Jaz, chill out :p

If he spelt it wrong then so be it, i understand you was only saying, but you could have padded it with some constructive points, good or bad.

And Stu, its a nice sig! And maybe he was a bit quick to jump :p its irrelivent tbh.
 
Jaz to be honest these sigs are not being given to people so who cares about the spelling?

And to be honest Culli's sigs are a hell of a lot better, but Jaz if you keep praticing maybe you'll get better than stu.

Just maybe criticise less and stu just calm it down a bit mate :p

anyway Stu, get back to what this thread is for, making sigs :)
 
Tried a bit of a different background for this sig.

Vaughansigtest.jpg


Thank-you to Trev for the tut

And also to Rabeta for the pre-cut
 
!x!Culli!x! said:
And also to Rabeta for the pre-cut

No probs mate ;)

And the sig is great mate, it looks cleaner than your other sigs because of the bg. It is really simple but very effective and I have seen the tut, its a good one! I also like the text fits the background well. However, I do get the feeling that the sig need something else. I suggest creating a clipping mask to add something extra

btw also love the way you have blended the render in, top work mate, reps for you, after I spread it around lol!
 
The background is quite good :)

But, i think that the cut of MV doesnt really go with it, Its too light a blue to blend well, If you still have the file, try darkening it. The font is ok, could be a little better.

Otherwise, its a decent crack.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top