War
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Tournament review
Interesting tournament in a lot of ways. India & England clearly played the best cricket in it, but neither team IMO were that impressive a ODI outfit as past top ODI teams.
Like when India won the 2011 w-cup i don't think they are the best ODI team in the world at all, while my own English side still needs Pietersen in it, especially with a solid but relatively old fashioned top 3 of Cook/Bell/Trott.
Thought windies team was pretty good, but their T20 insticts got the better of them.
S Africa's underlying problem is still the quota selection. As an outsider i understand this is touchy subject. But i'm not sure if in a full-strength ODI team Tsotsobe really deserves to be a squad regular over some better white/coloured players like Chris Morris. Phangiso is ok, but is he really a better all-round left-arm spinner than Roloef Van Der Merwe?. I think not
Wayne Parnell has been crap, yet he is always in around the squad. S Africa have the talent the translate their test dominance to the limited overs game quite easily. But their best XI/Squad because of quotas tends to deny this.
Pakistan bowling is great, but batting let them down.
N Zealand were they usual self. Can obviously still do with Ryder coming back. Same too with Sri Lan
The tournament can certainly be part of the future international calendar because contrary to public opinion 50 overs is not dead & this tournament proves that when a group of evenly matched teams come together 50 overs is wayy better than T20s.
The ICC however needs to control the rise of T20 leagues worldwide if they are going to keep the C-Trophy alive in the future. Because in international calender has been ridiculously over-packed for years now because of this MAJOR faux pas.
Interesting tournament in a lot of ways. India & England clearly played the best cricket in it, but neither team IMO were that impressive a ODI outfit as past top ODI teams.
Like when India won the 2011 w-cup i don't think they are the best ODI team in the world at all, while my own English side still needs Pietersen in it, especially with a solid but relatively old fashioned top 3 of Cook/Bell/Trott.
Thought windies team was pretty good, but their T20 insticts got the better of them.
S Africa's underlying problem is still the quota selection. As an outsider i understand this is touchy subject. But i'm not sure if in a full-strength ODI team Tsotsobe really deserves to be a squad regular over some better white/coloured players like Chris Morris. Phangiso is ok, but is he really a better all-round left-arm spinner than Roloef Van Der Merwe?. I think not
Wayne Parnell has been crap, yet he is always in around the squad. S Africa have the talent the translate their test dominance to the limited overs game quite easily. But their best XI/Squad because of quotas tends to deny this.
Pakistan bowling is great, but batting let them down.
N Zealand were they usual self. Can obviously still do with Ryder coming back. Same too with Sri Lan
The tournament can certainly be part of the future international calendar because contrary to public opinion 50 overs is not dead & this tournament proves that when a group of evenly matched teams come together 50 overs is wayy better than T20s.
The ICC however needs to control the rise of T20 leagues worldwide if they are going to keep the C-Trophy alive in the future. Because in international calender has been ridiculously over-packed for years now because of this MAJOR faux pas.