The PlanetCricket View: Is Harbhajan the all-rounder India was searching for?

Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Article by Abhishek Sharma

Since Kapil Dev’s retirement, team India could never see a perfect all-rounder in their side. There had been some players who contributed in the batting and the bowling department, but none could be termed as a good all-rounder.

Manoj Prabhakar and Lala Amarnath are two players who except for Kapil Dev could be considered as all-rounders. Lately, players like Sachin, Sehwag, Ganguly, Yuvraj, Raina and Rohit Sharma had good experiences in the bowling department, but they just weren’t too good to be considered as batting all-rounders. Ajit Agarkar, Anil Kumble and Praveen Kumar showed some signs of batting, but their batting form lasted for just one or two series. But I feel Ajit Agarkar had it in him to become a good bowling all-rounder for India.

From the current list, the Pathan brothers seem to be some serious talent. However, I feel that Yusuf really needs to bring some new variations in his bowling to be successful as a bowler. Irfan has the perfect blend of aggressive batting and bowling to be a good all-rounder. But since the past few years, his performance hasn’t been at its best. The selecters seem to have just forgotten about him. Nobody would disagree that he surely does deserve one more opportunity to prove himself.

Another guy who is emerging as an all-rounder is Ravindra Jadeja. The positives for him are that his bowling is as good as his batting, but the negatives are that both of them are pretty weak. Although people criticize him a lot, I usually feel that he is an integral part of India’s limited overs’ playing XI. Sometimes he chips in with one or two wickets and manages to score 30 odd runs which actually turn out to be very helpful for the side.

The latest inclusion in the “can become all-rounder” category is the turbanator, Harbhajan Singh. Ofcourse there is no question on his bowling skills, but when it comes to batting, he has always been an above average batsman. Bhajji often keeps on getting some odd 30+ scores and has also managed 50+ scores on some occasions. His recent form with the bat has suddenly raised this question in each cricket lover’s mind that, “Is Harbhajan the all-rounder India was searching for?”.

In the on-going test series against New Zealand, Harbhajan’s form with the bat has been truly amazing. First a 69 during which he reached his highest individual test match score and then a hundred, again he broke the same record of his highest score in tests. Coming at number 8 and reaching the maiden test hundred with a six shows the confidence this man has. The most important thing is that his hundred came in the second innings which isn’t an easy thing to do. The much experienced batting line-up failed but then it was Harbhajan alongside Laxman who stood firm and helped India draw the test match, which was going in the favor of the underdogs, the Kiwis.

In the second test, he surprised everyone yet again. He again scored a century, and this time with a strike rate of almost 100. Just when it looked that India would manage to get just a 10-20 runs lead over New Zealand, Harbhajan guided the Indian score and gave a lead in excess of 100. The highlight of this inning were the number of sixes he hit. He struck seven sixes in his 111*, and the same number of fours.

Harbhajan Singh has been helping India to come out of crucial stages and emerge at the top. This man surely has a lot of potential with the bat also. It would rather be too quick to term Harbhajan as an all-rounder, but two successive hundreds surely put him in the contention to become the next decent all-rounder for India.

Now that Harbhajan has all the confidence he needed to go out at the centre and perform with the willow in the hand, it will interesting to see how he performs with the bat at foreign wickets, or should I say, the non sub-continental pitches.



More...
 
He really was just lucky to be facing a couple of crap bowling spells and some poor captaincy in terms of field placement. He was aggressive early and that made Vettori let him score runs so he could target the other end. He probably wouldn't have been allowed to score more than 50 against any other bowling attack. Added to this quite a few of his shots were ugly swipes (though his technique is admittedly slightly better than Vettori's...but Vettori's works much better).

It's way too early for people to be calling Harbhajan an all-rounder. He needs to prove his worth with the bat against some of the top attacks in world cricket before he starts to convince anyone that he can actually bat.

And there were a number of grammar mistakes in that article...
 
Hell no. He's done what? Flailed around one of the worst test bowling attacks twice? (one time when they were a bowler down and carrying Patel who looks way short of test quality)

He's a decent bowler nothing more and a tailender who can bat a bit.
 
I would keep him at 'a tail ender who can bat'. It would be better if he is let that way. If people start calling him an allrounder and if he thinks that way, he will end up hurting himself more, like what happened to Irfan Pathan. Irfan was also a tail ender who can bat.
 
Irfan is for sure a better batsman than Bhajji. He's a proper batsman with good technique, bhajji is decent.

Plus Harbhajan can't bowl...pretty sure you need to do that to be an allrounder ;).
 
As I said about Mitchell Johnson's "allrounder" claims, it takes more to be an allrounder than tonking crap spinners on flat pitches.
The South African quicks will eat Harbhajan on green pitches, he is NOT an allrounder.
Look at Johnson, how many runs has he scored in the past year and a half with his "allround" ability?
Just another slogging tailender who got lucky.
Who next? Malinga?
 
As I said about Mitchell Johnson's "allrounder" claims, it takes more to be an allrounder than tonking crap spinners on flat pitches.
The South African quicks will eat Harbhajan on green pitches, he is NOT an allrounder.
I agree to this. That is why I mentioned that it will be interesting to see how he performs overseas. If somehow he manages to get good scores in South Africa against the likes of Steyn, he surely could easily be regarded as a good batsman. :)
 
India don't need an all rounder, their batting is strong enough anyways. They need a decent fast bowler
 
India don't need an all rounder, their batting is strong enough anyways. They need a decent fast bowler
Ishant Sharma IMO can support Zaheer very well. He delivers from a good height which should give him some natural bounce. And he is the kind of bowler who likes to hit the deck hard, unlike Sreesanth, Praveen Kumar and Ashish Nehra. That is a main reason why he has some success outside India.

I never have much faith on Sreesanth. He is just a lucky bowler that he has stayed in the team for so long.

Praveen Kumar and Ashish Nehra are two bowlers who are quite dependent on swing than pace, especially Praveen Kumar. Considering Nehra's age, giving much opportunities to Kumar is a better option as they both bowl pretty much the same way and Kumar is someone to be looked for the future.

I feel after Zaheer and Nehra retire, Praveen Kumar and Ishant Sharma would be the two main pacers for India. It certainly doesn't look good at this point, but I feel that these two guys can do very well in the future. :)
 
As I said about Mitchell Johnson's "allrounder" claims, it takes more to be an allrounder than tonking crap spinners on flat pitches.
The South African quicks will eat Harbhajan on green pitches, he is NOT an allrounder.
Look at Johnson, how many runs has he scored in the past year and a half with his "allround" ability?
Just another slogging tailender who got lucky.
Who next? Malinga?

Actually Johnson can hurt the best attack on the most difficult of pitches, like those awesome 96* and 124* where he smashed around every SA bowler he faced. But that rarely happens these days.
 
No way. Would have been happy with back to back 10 wicket hauls in match rather than this.

The last bowler to score century before him was never seen again and this could happen to him as well. :lol
 
I will still like to see him perform with bat in England and South Africa against quality opposition on less placid tracks before he is an allrounder in my eyes.
 
Meh, I'd like to see him take some wickets. Can't be an allrounder if you can't bowl.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top