Okay May Be I AM WRONG

omair456

School Cricketer
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
Okay i just played the demo for BLC.. and i think i did a huge mistake ordering CRICK 05 for US $60 as playing that demo didnt seem that much interesting as did the BLC.

i mean now i will have to waste another $40 to get BLC..

not to judge people and crick 05 (because i love EA sports games) but i did remember plaing LARA 96 on my SEGA MEGA DRIVES about ten years ago.
and i played that game till 2000... actually that was the only game i had on sega...

but anyways.. the whole point of this post is that.. BLC seems to be much better than crick.. IF ONLY THERE WERE AUTOPLAY.. it would be perfect.but
even without autoplay.. the balls go by very fast.. and i believe blc takes over crick 05..

any thoughts.
 
I wouldnt make the comparison based on the demos.

The Brian Lara demo had a lot more features and offered a lot more of an insight to the game than the EA demo did. 3 overs of batting against part-time spinners, or a whole 6 over match...
 
true. bro

sorry about hastiness.

just cant resist my self after playing an excellent 6 over match in BLC
 
omair456 said:
true. bro

sorry about hastiness.

just cant resist my self after playing an excellent 6 over match in BLC
im hooked 2 :)

bye bye any chance of socialising these holidays
 
after i get BLC i thnk this will be best $100 i ever spent.

thats all i got to say.

i mean come one after playing BLC demoe for 4 hours and CRICK 05 demo for about 2 hours.

i came to realize that this is the best graphics ever in any cricket game.. and both the games make the game more REALISTIC .. rather than a game.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top