The Greatest: The Top 20 of The Last 20

cricket_icon

International Cricketer
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
You know how it goes, you have a few friends around, there's a few drinks, some food and bang, all of a sudden we are all discussing who the best cricketer ever is, can we even compare eras? Covered pitches, uncovered pitches, the advent of limited overs cricket, longer tours, multiple nations now playing the game, world cups....the debate goes on and on.

I've made lists in the past ranking the best cricketers of all time, the best bowler's etc but they can never be fully comprehensive because those who say that eras can not be compared are right. How would Hobbs or Bradman compare now? Or Laker, Trueman and co? How would their fitness hold up in a world with 3 different cricketing formats?

So I decided to put together a list of the best cricketers I have seen in the last 20 years (around about the time I've been watching the sport).

So here goes:

Sachin Tendulkar​
Tests: 198 Runs: 15, 837 Avg: 53.86
ODIs: 463 Runs: 18, 426 Avg: 44.83

The finest batsman of his generation, the highest run getter and a dashing entertainer. he will be remembered for his twilight double century in ODI cricket, his exceptional century at Perth and countless other breath taking innings. It isn't just that Tendulkar gets runs but it's the way he does it, the flourish of the bat through his cover drive, the straight shot for four and the dancing blasts against the spinners. A complete shot maker if there ever was one.​

2. Wasim Akram​
Tests: 104 Wickets:414 Avg: 23.62
ODIs: 356 Wickets: 502 Avg: 23.52

The greatest fast bowler ever? Possibly, the greatest fast bowler of his generation? Oh most definitely. Akram was the complete package, swing, seam, bounce and in his youth, sheering pace. My memories of his will be his brutal yorkers and dashing bouncers, the enthusiastic celebrations and the fear he wrought in batsmen, even in the latter stages of his career. If you want a young bowler to be great, show him videos of this man.​

3. Shane Warne​
Tests: 145 Wickets: 708 Avg: 25.41
ODIs: 194 Wickets: 293 Avg: 25.73

Ahhh Warney, where to start? This is a man who knew how to court controversy, a real sports star but at the same time he knew what to do on the field. His leg spin was better than any I've ever seen and some say it is the hardest art to master. Then there was his ability to get under player's skins and just when they were at their lowest he would strike with beautiful crafted flight and turn. The term genius is often used too often but Warne was a genius.​

4. Muttiah Muralitharan​
Tests: 133 Wickets: 800 Avg: 22.72
ODIs: 350 Wickets: 534 Avg: 23.08

No man has picked up more international wickets than Mr Murali, and no man has ever done it with so many smiles either. A true gentleman of the game, I always loved watching Murali bowl, there was a child like wonder whenever he came on to the field. There was an extra bounce, an extra loud appeal, a twirl, a flutter, it was as if Murali was some sort of mad hat artist going about painting his masterpiece. His time in Australia was sad and is more a stain on the Australians and their cricketing board and fans than it is on the great Murali.​

5. Ricky Ponting​
Tests: 168 Runs: 13, 378 Avg: 51.85
ODIs: 375 Runs: 13, 704 Avg: 42.03

The greatest Aussie batsman since Bradman? Check. Australia's best captain? Check. The grumpiest man in an Ashes series? Check. It's sad that the second best batsman of our generation became a bit of a caricature in his final days, that grumpy, whingy old Aussie but he was on his day, the most entertaining and bloody minded batsman I've ever seen. Add to that a sharp cricketing brain and a tenure as captain in Asutralia's best generation and you have one of the icons of the sport.​

6. Jacques Kallis​
Tests: 162 Runs: 13, 128 Avg: 56.10 Wickets: 288 Avg: 32.43
ODIs: 321 Runs: 11, 498 Avg: 45.26 Wickets: 270 Avg: 31.69

Never as flamboyant or rampant as his competitors on this list, more content with grinding out runs and getting the odd wicket then actually destroying attacks or uprooting the top order, Kallis is the accountant of world cricket, and that is by no means criticism. Kallis is a great urn getter, a man you can count on when lessers have been bowled or caught at mid on.It's a relief that the greatest all rounder of the last 20 years is finally starting to get his just dues. And long may it continue.​

7. Glenn McGrath​
Tests: 124 Wickets: 563 Avg: 21.61
ODIs: 250 Wickets: 381 Avg: 22.02

Quite possibly the worst number 11 ever...lucky he was such a fine bowler then eh? McGrath was the closest thing to a machine I've ever seen on a cricket field, not a tank or a rocket propelled explosive, no, McGrath was a Rolex watch, always on time and always on point. He knew how to bowl the most naggingly annoying line in test cricket, his pace wasn't up to much when compared to contemporaries but had better judgement of line and length. He could seam the bowl and get the odd bit of swing. A great bowler, not quite as explosive as his peers but just as effective.​

8. Brian Lara​
Tests: 131 Runs: 11. 953 Avg: 52.88
ODIs: 299 Runs: 10, 405 Avg: 40.48

For me, Lara was never as complete a batsman as Tendulkar or Ponting but he may have been more expressive, more dashing...more cavalier. There was the high back lift, the jump forward, the exaggerated movements, all designed to catch the camera's eye. The greatest west Indian cricketer since Viv Richards, Lara had a tonne on his shoulders in a weakened, often embarrassing team. He never quite had the success as captain he would have hoped for but he was the one shining light in the teams worst point in history. He once asked, "Have I entertained?" The answer is a resounding "YES".​

9. Waqar Younis​
Tests: 87 Wickets: 373 Avg: 23.56
ODIs: 262 Wickets: 416 Avg: 23.84

Fast and furious, on his day the fastest and meanest bowler on the planet, Waqar was one of my favourite players to watch. He had that sheering yorker that broke toes and a bouncer that made batsmen jump, sway and duck out of the way. He never quite gets the recognition that other great fast bowlers do but at his best he could compete with them all.​

10. Adam Gilchrist​
Tests: 96 Dismissals: 416 Runs: 5, 570 Avg: 47.60
ODIs: 287 Dismissals: 472 Runs: 9, 619 Avg: 35.89

The greatest keeper/batsman to ever grace the game, Gilchrist was completely reliable behind the stumps, as good with the spin of Warne as he was with the fire of Lee. Add to that the ability to change the game with the bat, whether it was at the top of the order or with the tail. His 17 test hundreds speak volumes of his commitment to the art of batting, yet it never interfered with his exceptional glove work.​

11. Inzamam-Ul-Haq
12. Rahul Dravid
13. Curtly Ambrose
14. Kumar Sangakkara
15. Alan Donald
16. Courtney Walsh
17. Muhammad Yousuf
18. Anil Kumble
19. Mark Boucher
20. Mahela Jayawardene​

That top 20 was damn hard, I had to leave out Akhtar, Lee, Gayle, KP, Flintoff, Steve Waugh, Ganguly, I almost didn't include Boucher, Jayawardene and Kumble. The lkes of Hayden, Anwar, Smith, Steyn were almost all in with a shout.

So what do you guys think? What would your top 20 of the last 20 be?
 
I would probably have Muralitharan ahead of Warne. The former has better record in both Tests and ODIs. Yes, Shane Warne bowled the ball of the century and has the variety and all that but Murali didn't have a flurry of brilliant bowlers bowling from the other end. He had to be dependent on Chaminda Vaas to tighten up the screws from the other end. Vaas, who was nowhere near as good as Glenn McGrath.
 
I always think we just have this knee jerk reaction to put one of tendulkar/ponting/lara at the top. it was a batsmans age, for me muralitharan should be on top (or warne if you're that way inclined in that debate). the way they creamed their way through batting line-ups and were constantly succesful. Murali took 800 wickets over a period of time where countless batsmen averaged over 50 and bowlers came and went. how is that not better than tendulkar just mindlessly accumulating by merit of playing for three thousand years?

I'd also say you have to give mcgrath his dues, nowhere near as exciting as akram but twice as effective. for me the best player in the dominant australian side.

I'd have sehwag top 10 as well, his SR is the only bradman-esque stat in cricket, flat-tracker or not, his average didn't put far behind any of the other greats of the era and he won games single-handedly.

but yeah, always a topic that's going to get people debating.
 
I would probably have Muralitharan ahead of Warne. The former has better record in both Tests and ODIs. Yes, Shane Warne bowled the ball of the century and has the variety and all that but Murali didn't have a flurry of brilliant bowlers bowling from the other end. He had to be dependent on Chaminda Vaas to tighten up the screws from the other end. Vaas, who was nowhere near as good as Glenn McGrath.

Also Marlon, Murali chucked while Warne bowled, so yeah Murali should certainly be ranked higher than Warne!

----------

I always think we just have this knee jerk reaction to put one of tendulkar/ponting/lara at the top. it was a batsmans age, for me muralitharan should be on top (or warne if you're that way inclined in that debate). the way they creamed their way through batting line-ups and were constantly succesful. Murali took 800 wickets over a period of time where countless batsmen averaged over 50 and bowlers came and went. how is that not better than tendulkar just mindlessly accumulating by merit of playing for three thousand years?

I'd also say you have to give mcgrath his dues, nowhere near as exciting as akram but twice as effective. for me the best player in the dominant australian side.

I'd have sehwag top 10 as well, his SR is the only bradman-esque stat in cricket, flat-tracker or not, his average didn't put far behind any of the other greats of the era and he won games single-handedly.

but yeah, always a topic that's going to get people debating.

Exactly, Tendulkar only holds merit due to his longevity. Agreed also that people tend to place Lara/punter/Sachin at the top. I personally rate Warne as the best cricketer in the last two decades.

Anyways Untouchables666's top 20 in the last 20:

1. Shane Warne
2. Brian Lara
3. Adam Gilchrist
4. Wasim Akram
5. Curtly Ambrose
6. Glenn McGrath
7. Rahul Dravid
8. Verinder Sehwag
9. Shane Bond
10. Jacques Kallis

11-Alan Donald 12-Inzamam 13-Mathew Hayden 14- Mohammed Yousuf 15- Sanath Jaysuriya
16- Alec Stewart 17-Brett Lee 18- Anil Kumble 19- Shaun Pollock 20-Michael Bevan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also Marlon, Murali chucked while Warne bowled, so yeah Murali should certainly be ranked higher than Warne!

Never proved that. They were not able to prove any of the zillion allegations on other Asian bowler chucking as well. Not even Marlon Samuels who indeed chucks a bit. :p
 
Never proved that. They were not able to prove any of the zillion allegations on other Asian bowler chucking as well. Not even Marlon Samuels who indeed chucks a bit. :p

Most of the Asian spinners in the last 20 years have made their living by bowling the controverisal doosra, for which I agree is illegal, the only Asian spinner I have some respect for is Kumble. The Aussies have also complained about the illegal doosra in the past.
 
Most of the Asian spinners in the last 20 years have made their living by bowling the controverisal doosra, for which I agree is illegal, the only Asian spinner I have some respect for is Kumble. The Aussies have also complained about the illegal doosra in the past.

I do not find Doosra as an illegal type of delivery unless the bowler chucks while bowling the same. Doosra is more or less the the other one from an off spinner.
 
I do not find Doosra as an illegal type of delivery unless the bowler chucks while bowling the same. Doosra is more or less the the other one from an off spinner.

And thats your view and I have my view Marlon!
 
I always think we just have this knee jerk reaction to put one of tendulkar/ponting/lara at the top. it was a batsmans age, for me muralitharan should be on top (or warne if you're that way inclined in that debate). the way they creamed their way through batting line-ups and were constantly succesful. Murali took 800 wickets over a period of time where countless batsmen averaged over 50 and bowlers came and went. how is that not better than tendulkar just mindlessly accumulating by merit of playing for three thousand years?

I'd also say you have to give mcgrath his dues, nowhere near as exciting as akram but twice as effective. for me the best player in the dominant australian side.

I'd have sehwag top 10 as well, his SR is the only bradman-esque stat in cricket, flat-tracker or not, his average didn't put far behind any of the other greats of the era and he won games single-handedly.

but yeah, always a topic that's going to get people debating.

I'm not interested in debating Sehwag, because i know he has his supporters (blind or not) on planetcricket.

But i'd just like to highlighted that in your contrasting bold comments you have contradicted yourself.

You have rightfully highlighted that Mural almost certainly deserves to be ranked close to best if the best player of this era, along with someone like McGrath because he played in a batsman dominated era on flat decks where many average players got inflated 50+ averages.

So then how can you say Sehwag who is one of the major beneficiaries of that same flat deck era, but now was dropped because bowling standards & pitches got better in last 4 years can be rated highly - despite winning test for India in a batsman friendly era?

The 2000-2009 era was the weakest bowling era in test history. It was only compared to the 1900-1939 days when for almost 4 decades the only notable pace attacks was the Larwood/Voce/Bowes 1932 Bodyline England attack. Australia's Jack Gregory/Ted McDonald & England Tom Richardson/Bill Luckwood (some historians might throw windies pair of Martindale & Constantine in this group also).

So the majority of batsman that were dominated from 1900-1939 (except for Bradman, Hobbs, Hutton, Headley, Hammond to be safe) & 2000-2009. Cannot be rated as highly as batsman that played from 1948-1999.

1948-1999 starting from the Ray Lindwall/Keith Miller new-ball attack right down to 90s era section of Ambrose/Walsh, Wasim/Waqar, Donald/Pollock, Gough/Caddick, McGrath/Gillespie - batsmen always were tested with good pace attacks on fairly helpful pitches Sehwag never had bradmanesque stats versus the majority of actual quality pace he faced in his career - his numbers were abysmal. Weighing up all of these factors its strained cricket logic to place Sehwag in a top 20 list of players of last 20 years.

----------

My top 20 list:

1. Murali
2. McGrath
3. Tendulkar
4. Lara
5. Warne
6. S Waugh
7. Akram
8. Ambrose
9. Ponting
10. Kallis
11. Donald
12. Inzamam
13. Gilchrist
14. Sangakkara
15. Waqar
16. Steyn
17. Hayden
18. Dravid
19. Kumble
20. Pietersen

A Flower, Saqlain, Jayawardene, Anwar, Akhtar, Flintoff, S Pollock, Bond, M Taylor, Gillespie, Gough, G Smith, Gayle other very notable players.
 
Last edited:
because, like I said, his SR of 80 is the only phenomenal batting stat of the decade (beyond tendulkar's accumulative efforts). I know what people say about him, that he was a flat track bully, to an extent I agree (he did hit several pretty good knocks against spin bowling on spinning tracks), but he also made way more of the regular flat tracks than anyone else did. for me, a best ever list should be a player should contain unique players, and sehwag's achievements were unique even if in some other areas they were lacking. I know you're no fan of him war, so I'd rather just leave it as seeing things differently.

otherwise I agree with your list quite a lot, in fact, I think you've got the top 3 absolutely spot on, which would be the most contentious positions.
 
Fair enough my friend, as i said i don't really want to re-litigate that argument.

But yes i think once we look past the chucking assertions that many people still think Murali did, he has to rated as the best player of the last 20 years.

Not trying to start of Warne vs Murali argument either - but the factors that i always used to give Murali edge was events circa 2005/06.

In the 2005 Ashes Warne was a one-man bowling machine as AUS quick bowlers lost form, taking 40 wickets, bowling magic balls etc. But i would say when Murali came to England in 2006, ENG batsmen were even more confused.

Then also their records in India. India classic batting line-up handled both with easy in Indian conditions hence both average 40+ in that country. But Murali spell in Delhi 2005 when he literally ran through India - Warne never did to them in India.

Warne's best spell in India was Chennai 2004 & although he bowled well (best series in IND also) - Warne had to work that bit harder in his haul.
 
Quick attempt at the top 20...maybe i'll do just a top 10 :P

I'll do a separate list for batsman and bowlers as it is hard to compare them 1 on 1

1. Sachin Tendulkar
2. Ricky Ponting
3. Brian Lara
4. Rahul Dravid
5. Adam Gilchrist

1. Shane Warne/Muttiah Muralitharan
2. Shane Warne/Muttiah Muralitharan
3. Glenn McGrath
4. Wasim Akram
5. Brett Lee

I also think Chaminda Vaas deserves a mention... a lone seamer for sri lanka for much of the 90s and 00s and alongside Murali really made Sri Lanka a very competitive team. Doesn't really get much credit, I guess people tend to remember the old, slow Vaas rather than the accurate, swingy, and pretty pacey younger version.
 
It is indeed sad to see Boucher,Sangakkara,Inzamam,Kumble ahead of Steve Waugh and there is no mention about Mark Waugh.

Sachin should have had one spot below and Ricky Ponting should have come as the first best player of this era.Stats favour Tendulkar,but the types of pictches in which Ponting scored are bowling and pace friendly wickets whereas Sachin has played a lot in flat tracks.I am not saying that he is a flat track bully and stuffs as few people shout,but being an Asian cricketer it is obvious that everyone would have played mostly on flat tracks.And on the same note,Waugh should have been ahead of Mahela.Dravid anyway is not anywhere near the top in your list but he was a slight exception.He has much better records in England,West Indies and maybe New Zeland.So maybe i will fit in Rahul somewhere in the top ahead of Gilchrist maybe.

And the most important thing is even relatively new bowlers like Steyn have been mentioned but there is no signs of Shaun Pollock :eek:
 
^I agree with basically all your criticisms. Particularly Shaun Pollock, what an underrated player. I guess the trouble is that he's seen as very similar to McGrath, and McGrath is the more popular pick. And Pollock always suffers comparatively to guys like Wasim Akram, Steyn and Donald - guys who were a bit more exciting.

I'd also say you have to give mcgrath his dues, nowhere near as exciting as akram but twice as effective. for me the best player in the dominant australian side.

Agree! McGrath #1 player I've seen. He was consistently good, and did it in both formats. McGrath was the engine room, where guys like Gilchrist were just the cherry on top of the cake. Consider this:
In the 104 Tests McGrath and Warne played together, Australia won 68% of them.
In 20 Tests McGrath played with Warne missing, Australia won 65%
In 41 Tests Warne played with McGrath missing, Australia won 51%
Basically, McGrath was more important. Worth pointing out though, that neither had a significant increase in bowling average when the other was missing ie. both quality bowlers without the other.Got the info from this blog


And after some difficult considerations :eek:...my top 20 players in the last 20 years is as follows:
1 Glenn McGrath
2 Jacques Kallis
3 Ricky Ponting
4 Sachin Tendulkar
5 Brian Lara
6 Shaun Pollock
7 Allan Donald
8 Curtley Ambrose
9 Kumar Sangakkara
10 Hashim Amla
11 Shane Warne
12 Muttiah Muralitharan
13 Matthew Hayden
14 Virender Sehwag
15 Wasim Akram
16 AB de Villiers
17 Rahul Dravid
18 Brett Lee
19 Adam Gilchrist
20 Chris Gayle

I included limited overs in my reckoning, not a lot, but some - and it was a good tie breaker eg. between Tendulkar and Lara who I consider as virtually equal Test players. Warne and Murali might be higher on another day, but I liked my 6-10 guys too much.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top