Kshitiz_Indian
Executive member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2006
- Location
- New Delhi, India
No, it is not like that. Apparently these entrance examinations have been meant to look like "Mug it, clear it" but I can assure you its certainly not that.i cannot comment about the rest of the world but in india :
Education and Intelligence are parallel to each other !
Entrance examinations for professional courses are not an indication of a person’s intelligence.Different tasks, jobs, and professions require different skills.You cannot impose a generalized exam with a fixed syllabus as a measure of intelligence.
In universities abroad, there is something called a "Statement of Purpose" wherein you are required to state why you want to learn a particular subject and what you hope to gain by it. This is a more effective way of assessing a person because deserving students will get admission. I see no point in trying to prove your intelligence in one hour if you cannot apply what you learn.There is a rigid framework within which people are judged. It involves a lot of rote-learning. This says nothing about what a person really is like.
You also have to understand that while abroad universities are plenty and there is space for everyone in the top colleges, unfortunately there is not so here in India, so its necessary that only the most deserving receive the best of education there is on offer.
And, the 10'th board examination doesn't have anything related to "jobs" or a "career" directly. Its just that our system is such that schools allot streams by marks rather than by choice, so when the boards are scrapped, schools will have ultimate power. Say I study in school A and my friend in school B, both setting cut off's for Science stream at 75%. Now think if my school made a paper much tougher than school B, even if I might be the more deserving of two my friend will get the place which I should have got, but I didn't because the school made a half arsed effort at making a paper.
This is what you gain from standardization.