Video Game Mafia - Game Over: Maney and Spoobir Victorious

[Themer]

I'm a plain doctor FGS. But, 'Hero of Oakvale', does he have that sort of laugh or something?

No, not at all as far as I can remember.

I don't think it clears Papa Smurf if Themer's character claim is right. Themer's claim being right was probably one of the safest bets, as was Chewie's.

I agree. Papa Smurf has obviously gone for two characters who have the safest claims. Going by the fact that his character seems like a very odd one for there to be in this game for starters, the fact that he has gone for the two safest bets for his claim (I was at the time although people are now seeming to doubt me without cause I might add) and his general play has been a bit disconcerting.

Infact why would he check to see if me and Chewie were lying at all? It just doesn't make sense as its quite clear we are both genuine.

Unlynch : Aditya (apologies if I've been spelling your name wrong)
Lynch : Smurf

As for the write up thing it sounds to me like the laughing character is searching for Mario.

Donkey Kong is very likely to be in the game, I think we can all agree with that, right? As for the miller role, let's look at the reasoning behind it: Donkey Kong was the baddie in the original game Mario was in (the barrel hopping one). Now he's considered a good guy though and has had his own franchise.

To be fair Mario was a baddie in an early incarnation as well.

 

[Aditya]

Don't worry mate, it happens.

Going off now, will post my thoughts on this tomorrow.

 

[Papa_Smurf]

Going by the fact that his character seems like a very odd one for there to be in this game for starters.

This post goes to Ollie as well. I can't defend myself on this point. Like I said, even i hadn't heard of the character before. But to be fair, I haven't heard of most of the characters before in this game either. Wasn't it you Jack that was asking who was Link back in Day 1? But, he is a well known character in general:

Ace Attorney - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The link to the video game series.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Wright_(character) My character page in wikipedia.

http://aceattorney.wikia.com/wiki/Phoenix_Wright His page on his own wiki.

And not to feel like I'm clutching at straws, but my character produces 7,260,000 hits on google compared to your character's 102,000 hits Jack

Infact why would he check to see if me and Chewie were lying at all? It just doesn't make sense as its quite clear we are both genuine.

Erm, because I can? Why wouldn't I use my role? Chewie was the only one apart from Bevab to claim on Day 1, and like I said, I had not heard of your character, so I checked your claim out. It was either you or Lara Croft.

Like I said before, I possess the one role that can determine which of the claims are fake. I am confused by your guys' logic that you try to lynch me off, while you believe the guy who' s story has proven to have so many holes (i.e. Aditya )

----------

The only the other person apart from Aditya atm who I would even consider lynching is Dr. Pepper. Reluctance to claim. Claiming another role after asked to explain role-claim.

Plus, unlike Mario and Sonic, DK isn't a sure bet to be in the game.

 

[Themer]

And not to feel like I'm clutching at straws, but my character produces 7,260,000 hits on google compared to your character's 102,000 hits Jack

I fail to see how how many hits we have respectively on google makes a difference?

I still suspect Aditya but I feel alot more conviction in thinking you're dodgy.

 

[Papa_Smurf]

I fail to see how how many hits we have respectively on google makes a difference?

Cos you said my character was unlikely to be in the game. Just pointing out the obvious flaw in your theory as mine's more popular than your's.

What aspect of my play do you find fishy?

 

[Dr. Pepper]

]The only the other person apart from Aditya atm who I would even consider lynching is Dr. Pepper. Reluctance to claim. Claiming another role after asked to explain role-claim.

Plus, unlike Mario and Sonic, DK isn't a sure bet to be in the game.

I didn't claim another role, I explained one of my roles, and then later explained the other.

----------

I wasn't reluctant to claim either. I said last night that I wanted to talk about my role because I knew mine would be easily misconstrued. It's just that when I next got on there was a mass role claim and I ended up being the last one to do so.

 

[Themer]

Cos you said my character was unlikely to be in the game.

Well he isn't your stereotypical video game protagonist, now is he? Every other character has been part of a major game series as far as I can see.

I wouldn't call Ace Attorney a major game series to be honest.

 

[Papa_Smurf]

I wouldn't call Ace Attorney a major game series to be honest.

And I wouldn't call the Fable series either.

But I'm not going comment too much on this point, simply because I really don't know that much about video games.

If your only reason to go after me is because of my character, then I think it's weak.

I've said as much as I can, and know, on my character. There's nothing more I can do to defend myself on this point.

 

[Themer]

And I wouldn't call the Fable series either.

I would.

 

[Papa_Smurf]

That's entirely your point of view then. I've only got number of google hits to go by, but if you type our respective series into google, I produce about twice the hits you do (2 million : 4 million).

Just trying to show that your reason for lynching is weak, and heavily flawed. Your gambling the lie detector, or to be more specific, the role-claim checker, purely on the hunch that my character isn't a popular protagonist.

That's just reckless.

----------

And I'm struggling to understand the logic of lynching me over someone who's revealed roles and their targets during the night, tried to lynch off the cop (before and after claim), and has had his claim disproven. Aditya's claimed that anyone who targets him gets silenced. Hedger targeted him. He wasn't silenced.

 

[Spoobir]

Themer's character was only in the first Fable game anyway

Also whether the character is evil or not depends on how you play the game...

 

[Dr. Pepper]

Themer what are your specific roles again?

 

[Themer]

Just trying to show that your reason for lynching is weak, and heavily flawed. Your gambling the lie detector, or to be more specific, the role-claim checker, purely on the hunch that my character isn't a popular protagonist.

That's just reckless.

I think we're at the stage where lynching anyone will be classed as reckless by said person going by their role claims.

It'd be reckless to lynch the roleblocker.
It'd be reckless to lynch the double voter.

We've got to look beyond that to see who has the weakest claims and sadly at the moment its you in my opinion.

----------

Themer what are your specific roles again?

I can protect once (used), roleblock once and investigate once.

 

[Papa_Smurf]

All the claims are believable. And like I said, that's pretty much cleared everyone for the time being. So we have to go on their past actions, poor defence, and if they've given off contradictory statements. Adi checks on all 3.

 

[Dr. Pepper]

Right okay.

I'm most suspicious of Aditya and Barmyarmy. Barmyarmy didn't get any PM when he tracked me but he did when he searched Alex Mercer (Barmyarmy previously ). There's no reason for him not to have got a PM saying I visited no one so I don't know why he didn't. Was he roleblocked or was he just making it up?

Aditya's story just doesn't add up. No one was silenced and someone should have been.