Were the Aussies paid to lose

Do you think the Aussies were paid to lose the ashes.

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • No

    Votes: 20 74.1%
  • Hmmm Maybe

    Votes: 3 11.1%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .

Sman-21

Club Cricketer
Joined
Jan 1, 2004
Location
Perth
Online Cricket Games Owned
Well during and after the ashes there has been plenty of stupid polls from the english fans. So heres another

Do you think the Aussies were paid to lose the ashes.
All of a sudden first game after the ashes every batsmen is hitting the ball cleanly,Flintoff is not a problem,fielders look keen and have there minds on the job.
 
Please do not create multiple threads on the same topic in future.

On your question-I think Aussies just went through a bad phase,maybe the conditions did not suit them,also dont forget that they did not give the youngsters enough chances then.
 
i take it the thread because we all know the aussies were paid:p lol jokes
 
The thread obviously.

I take it the thread starter has some sort of evidence to back up his claim?

Whats that? You don't? Can't say I'm surprised.
 
How dare you suggest Aus match fixed. They weren't perpared for English conditions. Simple as that.
 
aussie1st said:
How dare you suggest Aus match fixed. They weren't perpared for English conditions. Simple as that.
Or the English team.
 
aussie1st said:
How dare you suggest Aus match fixed. They weren't perpared for English conditions. Simple as that.

I was being sarcastic(sorry if i didnt make it clear) cos yeh i just think its a stupid question
 
lol bollocks this thread is. paid to lose .. must someone always look for elements of fluke or an explanation for a contest and great series. india in pakistan - great series, its black and white, end of story. as is here, the ashes, australia in england, great cricket, australia were genuwinely outplayed this time around. no excuses.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top