Na Maloom Afraad
Only Man In The Sky
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2012
I wasn't the one who asked you openly, you made a public comment first. Why would I take this behind closed doors once you've already said what you wanna say in front of everyone?
40+ bonus ratings >
Upsets in T20's I can understand, even keeping things interesting for lower rated teams, I can understand. But, in ODI's using CricSim you maybe have a 1 in 20 "funny" result where a county team beats an international team mostly by the simmer tweaking the ratings.
You don't use the sim, you know nothing about the sim. A "funny" result, as you put it, isn't a rare sighting in this sim. India lost to China in the final of the Asia Cup despite the massive ratings gulf. Morocco, my team, lost to Saudi Arabia in the Arab Cup final despite a massive ratings gulf. England beat New Zealand in the Nations League semi-final despite, at the time, there being a massive ratings gulf between the two sides. Shit, India lost to Greece in the first tournament we ever did in this league. There are literally dozens of more results in this very league that are like that, that I'm not remembering of the top of my head, so that Pakistan-South Africa result is the last "funny result" of the league.
There's nothing wrong in the authenticity of the league, nor are there any "funny" results in the league. If there was, you wouldn't be the only one questioning it. You can't go levying around accusations regarding the authenticity of the league because you can't take losing a single match.
Even if you are upset about the result, which is a perfectly justified feeling to have, why would your first thought be that I've tweaked the ratings to make Pakistan win or South Africa lose? You've literally levied an accusation of favoritism at me because you couldn't handle losing a match in a simulation league?
