You're right. He's never done anything with the bat.Also, what is the point of carrying Ben Stokes along if he isn't going to be used as a bowler?
The last time, the nominated captain gave over the reigns to his deputy, the teams have wonHe's ill
I didn't even talk about his batting. The point is if he is an AR, who has been specifically brought back for the World Cup, he better be utilized 100%You're right. He's never done anything with the bat.
He was specifically brought back as a batter not as an all rounder.The last time, the nominated captain gave over the reigns to his deputy, the teams have won
2015- Bailey and Clarke
2016- Chandimal and Malinga
2023- Williamson and Latham & now Bavuma and Markram. So, a joint winner this year, then?
Post automatically merged:
I didn't even talk about his batting. The point is if he is an AR, who has been specifically brought back for the World Cup, he better be utilized 100%
Am pretty sure,ECB won't send anymore SOS calls to him in the future for ODIs. At the moment,he seems to be a liability,that England could have done without.
That’s complete load of BS. He literally just hit the highest ever score in an ODI by an English player a month ago. He’s a talismanic player and a leader in the dressing room. And England were under no illusions it’s been openly said he’s there a batter onlyThe last time, the nominated captain gave over the reigns to his deputy, the teams have won
2015- Bailey and Clarke
2016- Chandimal and Malinga
2023- Williamson and Latham & now Bavuma and Markram. So, a joint winner this year, then?
Post automatically merged:
I didn't even talk about his batting. The point is if he is an AR, who has been specifically brought back for the World Cup, he better be utilized 100%
Am pretty sure,ECB won't send anymore SOS calls to him in the future for ODIs. At the moment,he seems to be a liability,that England could have done without.
Has it been mentioned anywhere? If we assume he has been brought in the side as a batter, then it comes at the expense of Jason Roy- a foolish decision reallyHe was specifically brought back as a batter not as an all rounder.
Hitting the highest ever ODI score doesn't hide the fact that this star player is an effective bowler. His bowling abilities can be better utilized by England. Just baffles me why they would carry someone with the stature of Botham and ask him not to bowl, effectively treating him as a Hick!That’s complete load of BS. He literally just hit the highest ever score in an ODI by an English player a month ago. He’s a talismanic player and a leader in the dressing room. And England were under no illusions it’s been openly said he’s there a batter only
It's been the a large point of discussion since he retired.Has it been mentioned anywhere? If we assume he has been brought in the side as a batter, then it comes at the expense of Jason Roy- a foolish decision really
Jason Roy who’s been in and out of form for 3 years, already dropped in one format and who couldn’t play any warm up games with back spasms. Also Brook was in for Roy not stokes, as shown by the provisional squadHas it been mentioned anywhere? If we assume he has been brought in the side as a batter, then it comes at the expense of Jason Roy- a foolish decision really
Tried to field in his follow through, flicked his bowling finger so he lost all feeling in itSurprised to see Root bowling 6 overs. Also what happened to Reece Topley?
I think all of the above would want Ben Stokes the batter instead of no Ben Stokes.Anyhow,of the team, the board and the fans are okay with this, I guess my objections wouldn't matter.
He has been blowing hot and cold. Once he comes back, needs to assert himself via his batting. Hendricks has shown that he can adapt quickly.Bavuma's injury a blessing in disguise