Doesn't happen with other countries as well. No reason why he should be preferred if his team has won everything in its way. His own form and tactics need to be considered as well.
Bavuma's leadership is laughable. Haven't heard anyone sing accolades of him. The mere fact that a half injured person wanted to be at the helm in a KO game is questionable. It's a weird hunger to be the 1st SA captain to win a World Cup KO.
Also, as a captain, either your captaincy or your form should be good. In this case, it was neither. We've had captains like Ganguly who have been out of form for lengthy periods, but their tactics were spot on.
You've merely quoted an older article. The one I mentioned is the latest and still talks about the quota requirements at large.
His side. His tactics were weird. Single handedly destroyed by allowing them to take singles and close the gap.
What an utterly preposterous point. Test side form vs ODI form? Wonder what you're smoking!
Me?
I did say Babar was poor and he seemed lost. I comment as I see it.
Let's be clear on one thing. This was a South African side led jointly by Bavuma and Markram. The side seemed to respond more to Aiden Markram whenever he took charge. Their path to success can be attributed to the wins scored by Markram.
Bavuma never really seemed to make tactical changes. Babar was marginally better, given that his own batting form was better than Temba's.