Absolute Stunners FC

  • Thread starter Deleted member 11215
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 11215

Guest
stunnershn5.png




asfc-1.jpg





Squad Numbers:​




Duded64 - 14​



Talk About Everything and anything about the stunners here. i will post the team here and the formations :). Also i will announce the vice captain here so if you want to be considered post here :).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Carn the Stunners!!! I'd like to put my name forward for VC!

I made a little logo as well :p

stunnershn5.png


I also believe, dependant on our team set up, that a 4-3-1-2 formation would be best, with me playing just behind the two strikers! and of course if things were getting tight late on and we were winning by a goal or so we could always bring off one of the strikers for an extra midfielder or defender and put me upfront!
 
Last edited:
ABSOLUTE STUNNERS FC (AS FC): (requires 1 GK; 4 DF; 3 MF; 3 ST)
Will Jones (c)
Shaun Briggs
Matt Fender
Sam Halls
A Naufal
Justin Allison
Ryan 'Pinchi' Dunn
 
Briggsey said:
Carn the Stunners!!! I'd like to put my name forward for VC!

I made a little logo as well :p

stunnershn5.png


I also believe, dependant on our team set up, that a 4-3-1-2 formation would be best, with me playing just behind the two strikers! and of course if things were getting tight late on and we were winning by a goal or so we could always bring off one of the strikers for an extra midfielder or defender and put me upfront!

Nice logo.

We haven't got any width with that formation. 3-1-4-2 I suggest. The one can be a holding midfielder, protecting the backline (like Makelele) then 2 ahead of him and wingers.
 
At the moment VC is a toss up between briggsy and the muel
 
duded64 said:
At the moment VC is a toss up between briggsy and the muel
Mainly because were the only 2 people that have posted, right? lol

themuel1 said:
Nice logo.

We haven't got any width with that formation. 3-1-4-2 I suggest. The one can be a holding midfielder, protecting the backline (like Makelele) then 2 ahead of him and wingers.
Well we will have to see how our team spans out, if we get enough players then im sure we could have a wide variety of formations. I dont like the simple 4-4-2 it has its good points but it has more bad ones and could easily be dismantled by the opposition!

Need to be creative if we want to do well!
 
i would have recommended the 5-3-2 but we would hardly score goals then... but yet again... maybe we can decide that after seeing the whole squad

p.s. I posted first... [ A Naufal - thats me] but no i dont want to be nominated as VC... too much strain...
 
im thinking a 3-5-2 atm which gives 2 wingbacks a crucial role. what do you think?
 
I personally thik wing-backs are more trouble than what they are worth, leaving the defence slightly bare and the midfield crowded.

Sam has a nice idea going although I think a 4-1-2-1-2 could also work, four defenders in a conventional manner, a holding midfielder, two wings, and someone playing behind the striker. Just my 2 cents.
 
Be daring and have a 1-1-8 formation. Don't be scared to experiment
 
im gonna try a 1-1-8 in a friendly :p.

BTW we need to decide a stadium name and capacity. post your ideas :).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top