C2004 more screenshots

[bomber]

First time Ive seen them. Thanks Rangeela, keep up the good work mate : )

 

[0601731]

mate you seem to be outdated.anyways here are a few for u

 

[0601731]

2

 

[Radaga]

very nice screenshots, much better than before
Thanks guys!

 

[0601731]

one more

 

[ImranKhan]

i think its no 9. its sachin tendulkar

 

[zimrahil]

Don't wish to concern anyone but this shot..............(6 hit straight drive)

 

[zimrahil]

and this shot (leg glance), having resulted on both occasions with the batsman missing the ball. If you recollect, these two shots were regularly played by the cpu and they would miss the ball more often than not in c2002,as is the case with the c2004 screenshots. I hope the same AI is not in place :confused:

 

[0601731]

unfotunately it doesnt seem they have changed any strokes.
no slog sweep yet.

 

[jonah]

Originally posted by zimrahil
Don't wish to concern anyone ....

D'oh! I'm getting worried now you've mentioned this Phil. Please don't let it be the case, or the likes of yourself and Ravi will be in for a busy time dealing with requests to rectify the AI again .

 

[T20]

can you guys spot some signs of blc(!) items reused? : :o

 

[boooo]

Originally posted by zimrahil
and this shot (leg glance), having resulted on both occasions with the batsman missing the ball. If you recollect, these two shots were regularly played by the cpu and they would miss the ball more often than not in c2002,as is the case with the c2004 screenshots. I hope the same AI is not in place :confused:

can anyone spot that it might be a one off

u cant say stuff like that untill you have played the game

 

[cricketfan1]

for me, that leg glance looks extremely different to the one in 2002, so that can only be good. It was more of a front foot highly un-realistic leg glance in 2002 and the back foot one was a flick off the hip, this one on the screen looks more like the ones you see in real life cricket matches with the swinging ball and getting trapped back plumb in front and the batsman seems to be leaning over his front pad and loosing balance its the old classic left handers dismissal to the in swinging ball ( except its right hand in the screen ) - looks very realistic if you ask me.

As for the straight drive i guess its just something we wont now untill we play the game, the one concern i have over it is the un-realistic finish of the bat behind his head! but i do like the look of the celebrations in this version from what ive seen so far, they look far more free flowing and less robotic e.g. the bowler in the leg glance screen sticks his arms up and on the other screens on future gamez with the whole team.

one question i have is to 0601731, you say about being outdated and say you have new screens when i have seen them last week, and plus you say something about number 9 Tendulkar? have the screens been changed or something?

 

[kmk1284]

check the paki guy hittin the ball pic
if u see carefully there are four shadows beneath him indicating it is a night and the shadows change as opposed to c2002

 

[cricketfan1]

still the shadows dont seem long enough for me. its minor i know and it wouldnt really bother me if there were no shadows whatsoever on night games, but to be picky they should be longer.

Does anyone know weather all the county teams will be included? ( 18 of them ) and two divisions? plus will all the kits be properly sponsored and correct like Fifa ( for domestic? )