War
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Drogba would need replacing yet, but it wasn't exactly urgent. There was no value in signing Torres for ?50m, as if they had to sign him.
Debatable to be fair.
As for playmakers they could've signed Alexis Sanchez. They could've gone for Modric. Hell they could've just paid that little bit extra and signed Steven Pienaar. There's just no creativity in the side at the moment.
We both Know Modric wasn't a realistic option in January. Why would Modric have left Spurs given how they where playing?. Harry would never let that happen.
Their is no guaranteed that Sanchez would want to play in England & if he would their is no guaranteed he would chose Chelsea. Plus dont forget Pienaar did reject Chelsea for Spurs.
Which overhaul proves as i said, their was no legitimate players who Chelsea could have signed or would have wanted to sign for Chelsea apparently. If Torres had stayed with pool - Chelsea would have had no new players right now (since i think Luiz was influenced into coming to Chelsea based on the news that Torres was going).
It's true that they've been playing 4-3-3 for years now but they have to adapt. The 4-3-3 isn't working so they need to change it. But they can't really play a diamond because they have no playmaker, and they have to play this very open 4-4-2 that most sides will exploit.
Even a creative wide player would've done tbh. Just someone who would bring a burst of excitement and creativity. That's why I think Sanchez is the perfect signing for Chelsea - he's fast, he's eccentric and has that spark of brilliance about him.
Well yea i did say from the inception goal-scoring/creative wingers would have been a good buy given the decline in form of Molouda & Anelka (along with Lampard goals from mid-field being missed due to his early season injury).
So really once they get that type of winger next summer, i see no reason why they would need to change from their traditional 4-3-3 set-up.