But Watson and Afridi opening the batting in a 25 over game on a poor pitch is surely more valuable than 5 overs from Warne? A poor pitch means any of our bowlers will do well, and Watson and Afridi will be a handful on it, while Watson's batting will allow us to carry just 3 other bowlers and bat down to 8 on a poor pitch. That seems more valuable to me...The owners have said they want Warne playing ever game
Well it helps if you tell me what kind of bowler he is :But whats the point in holding a player ransom. He has already stated that he doesnt want to play under you guys, and said he wont post frediw will!
zMario, who'd you want otherwise?
But Watson and Afridi opening the batting in a 25 over game on a poor pitch is surely more valuable than 5 overs from Warne? A poor pitch means any of our bowlers will do well, and Watson and Afridi will be a handful on it, while Watson's batting will allow us to carry just 3 other bowlers and bat down to 8 on a poor pitch. That seems more valuable to me...