England in Australia

Nothing like waking up and quickly putting the radio on and here Colly facing a ball. Instantly think Aussies did post a really high total and we've doing bad or we got them all out early and doing vrey well. Then I heard Colly get out and didn't even need to check which one it was.
 
brad352 said:
Gee, our bowlers aren't doing too badly on a pitch that's apparently so flat anybody could score runs.
lolololol

I totally agree with Bill Lawry, this is more or less a perfect wicket. Good spinners will get good turn, good pacemen will get wickets and the pitch is true enough for plenty of runs to be scored.

Just look at Flintoff, if England got another Freddy's worth of bowling out of Harmison or Anderson (and it is certainly within their talents), we would not be looking at 9/602. England just haven't been consistent enough to produce the sustained pressure.

We haven't seen much from the spin contingent, but Pietersen and even Giles showed enough turn to suggest Panesar has already been a wasted resource in this series. Expect a few to go to Warne (if there's anything left for him to take).
 
I have to go into school and face an Australian colleague now...
I still have faith that we can recover from 40/3 and not lose by an innings inside 3 days...
 
Oh yep those flippers are back, Warne certainly wasn't playing around there. First one was goodish although wasn't as quick so it gave KP a chance to adjust from his pull or that would have been LBW. Second was a shocker but it was back to the pace I'm use to.
 
My prediction: Ashley Giles will score a "glorious" 25 to help England avoid the follow on, and Fletcher will use that as justification to keep a bowler who now averages 53.78 against Australia.
 
Last edited:
I felt Monty was sorely missed in the first innings,Giles might have got a decent wicket of Martyn and got some bowling under his belt,but Monty would have attacked more and would have been more than useful against the tailenders and we might not have seen someone like Clark get a quick 39 odd.Id say picking Giles as a defensive move by England,one that might backfire.
 
Picking Giles will backfire but I agree with what Chappel (I think) said earlier today that England in the next test will play both Giles and Panesar and use the 3 seamers as Anderson and Harmison both got hammered. I don't see this as a good option since both are left arm spinners but they surely have to drop Anderson as his bowling was atrocious. Perhaps Mahmood for the first test?? Or bring back Plunkett who doesn't have much cricket under his belt.
 
Now then, was that the attempted flipper from Warne? I feel the Aussies will be more aggressive (as shown in the first ball of Warne's over). I wonder if the players are still having a drink after the match. Anyway, will be watching throughout the night tomorrow, hopefully KP will get a big knock.
 
What a shame, I was really hoping I got a nice tasty piece of humble pie, but in the end every single one of my gripes before this test came true except Jones keeping fallability, and even then it was not like he was ever tested.

It was exactly this situation that demanded Panesar, a lot of overs needed against a strong middle order, and Giles yet again showed that he doesn't possess the skill to pick up the key wickets. I don't think he turned the ball once all day, and never once beat the bat.

As for the rest of them, Freddie bowled excellently, but his captaincy was yet again suspect, tailenders new to the crease, and he set pretty defensive fields, just as he did in India and against Sri Lanka. You CAN'T just bowl short at tail-enders without sticking someone in short-leg or silly point. The bowling itself was fairly dire, Hoggy did a good job in a long spell, and despite the various decent balls from Anderson, there was always a pressure relieving four ball in every over, more often than not two of them. Harmison did bowl better, and got a couple in the right areas, but was still quite simply well below international standard.

When they did finally get to the tail-enders they just kept throwing the ball in the slot, instead of looking for the yorkers and short balls at the batsmans throat, even when two chances were created the fielders didn't back them up, and the moment Cook dropped that catch I could see him being out before the end of the day.

All in all, another excellent day for Australia, and a poor one from most of the England team. The batsman looked desperately short of match practice on thes bouncier pitches, not seeming to trust the bounce and needlessly playing at everything, whilst Strauss' pull shot to a ball that was moving away from him was incredibly irresponsible. First Hayden and then Hussey and Ponting showed that all it takes is to see off the new ball and it gets a lot easier, but the English batsman except Cook seemed determined to play with needless risk.

Collingwood showed worrying signs that the speculation that his batting isn't suited to these pitches with absolutely no footwork and when you look at the England batting lineup that is left, without a big partnership from the current two, they will almost certainly fall well short.. barring of course a big double hundred from Giles :p
 
The flippers didn't look right, but the first one would have nailed Pietersen if it was just a bit sharper. He definitely didn't pick it, although, maybe he would have picked it if it was more pronounced.

lol Mahmood. Surely there's someone else. To be honest I didn't think Anderson was all bad news, he shaped the ball well at times, got some good shouts. Just not consistent.
 
I just relised that really, Harmison's record isn't that impressive. I think England really need to find some better bowlers from somewhere.
 
Harmison can be good on his day and his record is rather decent compared to many other modern bowlers. He just had a bad start to the series, he still is the key to England's success and I'd play him for the rest of the series.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top