italiansammy
School Cricketer
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2003
- Online Cricket Games Owned
harmison bowled pretty bad... in 5 overs, he cost 35 runs...
Originally posted by jonah
There you go rocklara, a terrific win for your guys. Congrats. Were you there?
Unbelievable stuff from Smith at the end, to pull it round from nearly 2 runs a ball needed with 8 or so overs left to win with 2 overs to spare is a great effort. I have to agree with the_gas though in that some of the English bowling wasn't great at the end (apart from Freddie who bowled a lovely over at the death even though he could hardly run ), but take nothing away from the Windies batsmen, a great win. I knew we'd lose though as soon as Tresco got his century...
Sets the series up nicely now with 2 left to play (weather permitting: ).
Originally posted by madmattg
Only comment how could you expecta loss from a man scoring a century it wasnt absurdly slow?
Originally posted by jonah
I think on every occasion bar one if Tres has scored a century in an ODI England have ended up losing it. It was a terrific innings though, good to see him back in the runs .
The-gas, I totally agree again. I can't for the life of me understand why Butcher isn't in the ODI team (or Thorpe for that matter). In fact, absurdly, he's never won an ODI cap! Unbelievable when, as you say, he can bowl a bit too and when on song can score in Tests as quick as many do in ODI's. I am a bit biased though as I am a Surrey fan and he is one of my favourite players . I suppose they think they're building for the next World Cup, but yes, surely you've got to pick your best team, whatever the ages. A fewer 'older' players can help bring the youngsters on quicker, IMO.