duffarama
Chairman of Selectors
I don't think there is any trouble in you getting 36 off an over langerrox.
duffarama said:I don't think there is any trouble in you getting 36 off an over langerrox.
I guess the only way would be to edit the batsman's stats to extraordinary figures and the bowler's stats to unextraorinary figures. (excuse the mouthful of language used)edenkor said:Given the annoying fact that in the ICC 2005 game, scoring a 6 is like Glenn McGrath scoring fifty runs in an international; it doesn't happen very often. I doubt whether 36 off an over would be possible. However, proving this theory incorrect would be nice.
or photoshopduffarama said:I guess the only way would be to edit the batsman's stats to extraordinary figures and the bowler's stats to unextraorinary figures. (excuse the mouthful of language used)
OK Zorax, post a pic of your most expensive over then.ZoraxDoom said:Thats it? 19? C'mon, you can do better than that
god your pathetic, your so great making up recordsDS_4_life said:i got 4 runs off all 6 bals in an over. Thats 24 runs.
Don't call him God, that's blasphemy.langerrox said:god your pathetic, your so great making up records
lol agreed, good ole 'forgot to take screenie' excuse aka i make up records to seem coolduffarama said:Don't call him God, that's blasphemy.
langerrox said:lol agreed, good ole 'forgot to take screenie' excuse aka i make up records to seem cool