Read what i said again sir. I did not say BCCI is responsible for crickets current problems. I said a lack of a proper independent ICC is. The BCCI however given is unfair influence & bullying is compounding the problems such as:
1.
The URDS issue. The whole cricket world accepts the URDS should be universal in tests except India. Its is a utter insult to cricket stats & the sport in general that we can have simultaneous series playing in which everyone is not subjected to the same rules.
The BCCI already knows that the ICC doesn't have the money & hasn't figured out a way to pay for the URDS technology itself. Thus it is asking host countries to foot the bill. The BCCI are just compounding a simple issue by showing foolish reluctance to use the technology just because their players used the technology incorrectly during the 2008 test series vs Sri Lanka.
2.
Pakistan's situation in world cricket. A situation which seems to be disintegrating every other month. I blame the lack of not having a strong ICC for what could may happen to your Pakistan soon. As Mr.Samiuddin (spell check) highlighted in this
article
They, the ICC have basically taken so long because its a lame duck organisation. Like football's governing body FIFA, if the ICC was a proper governing body. It would have had strict rules, prohibiting governments from being involved as a influence in cricket boards, which happens in football. Which has been a big problem in PAK cricket for years, which has lead to:
- all players being selected due to political connections & nepotism as you highlighted. Instead of on merit.
- the talk i've heard in interviews Imran Khan said himself. Oone of the reasons he stopped playing domestic cricket in Pakistan during the 1980s. Was because the domestic system was structured so abysmally & it stiffled talent. For example you have the Pakistan Airlines & Pak Bank being teams in their FC competition - instead of having proper state teams like Lahore, Karachi etc.
If all these years the PCB, knew they had a real strong & independent ICC breathing down their necks, that had those strict have rules in place, they would have gotten their house in order. The PCB thus, would have reformed itself yearsa ago i feel, since they would know imminent bans/suspensions from the ICC would have been on its way.
Plus if all this was done. Guys like Asif & Aamir would have likely not have gotten involved with match-fixing. Since they would have been educated from an early age about those corrupt factions of PAK cricket & would have been protected.
3.
South Africa's quota problem. This is just as bad a nepotism in PAK cricket, but the S Africans do it sneakily. Also given that S Africa are such a strong team, the forced black players selections doesn't affect them much if at all. But many talented white players tend to go Kolpak in England & SA have lost many quality players due to this most famously Pietersen.
In football their is strict "government must not mix with sports policy" or else teams risk getting banned. If ICC was very strong S Africa could would not be able to get away with it on a international level (although they could still do it domestically).
4.
IPL in its current format. IPL should never have been allowed to created as a private league, it had to be a international league. That 4-international player rule is ridiculous.
The IPL can easily be English premier league of cricket, if teams are mix with proper combination of established Indian players, actual talented young Indians (instead of many joke Indian players that make up many IPL sides) & foreign stars.
Since at the end of the day the IPL isn't bringing forth any talented young Indian players that the Ranji Trophy or MRF pace foundation wont.
The IPL unless it is revamped should never have a window, given that the BCCI doesn't even have the decency to care about the tough "club vs country" decisions that players from the financially weak countries such as Windies, NZ, SRI, PAK, BANG have to make every year. All those cronies care about is getting the players - they dont if those weak nations lose their key players to IPL riches.
5. Lack of proper priorities in the ICC given it is lame duck organisation.
To quote Windies coach Gibson from a recent article:
Ottis Gibson: 'West Indies are 10 or 15 years behind the curve' | Specials | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
Cricket is small community with just 8 strong nations. ICC should be spending money to help the weaker of these top 8 teams. So as to make cricket extremely competitive amongst the main 8 nations. Instead of wasting it to try to promote it in America & other developing nations currently.
T20 is potentially the vehicle in which emerging countries can like cricket however & the ICC should stop wastefully sending/investing money to/in those nations & probably have more emerging nations T20 tournaments.
But with regards to windies & other weak top 8 cricket financial nations like N Zealand, S Lanka & Pakistan. ICC should definitely aid in investing to money for academies which would in the end aid in those countries having strong domestic competitions. Since all of those countries historically have always struggled with players having great domestic records but struggling to translate that to internal cricket. Compared to AUS, ENG, SA (India also in the both of former in some area's)
Such an investment would go along way in leveling the playing field with the top 8 nations & once thats is secure i would have no issue with them trying to invest in emerging countries.
These are the major problems currently in cricket. Very stupid problems if you ask me that could be easily fixed if the ICC was a proper governing body.