If S Africa would have won, that would have to rated as highly as IND Kolkotta 2001 win over AUS in terms of come back wins in test history. You just dont follow on and win in test cricket & you just don't chase 450+ in test history & win.
S Africa's recovery does aid in their aura as clear # 1 though. Similarly vs AUS in Adelaide last year - AUS dominated the S Africa for most of the test match to IND here & S Africa took that momemtun into the Perth test & destroyed AUS - so IND despite them standing up admirably in this test, should be wary of this.
Proteas made a big mistake to play Tahir though, he may have spun S Africa to victory in their most recent test in vs PAK. So he has his uses in certain conditions, but vs IND he was always likely to be a easy target, because of IND historic ease, IND bats handle leg-spinners. This is noticeably exposed when M Morkel got injured, another seamer then to support Steyn/Philander/Kallis might have stopped Pujura/Kohil partnership.
Now that they have called up Kyle Abbot, their best XI is to return to an all-pace attack and also pick Rory Klienvelt. Although i feel B Hendricks, Chris Morris or Ryan Mclaren based on form & availabity (M De Lange & Hardus Viljeon are injured or suspended) would have been a better choice instead of Klienvelth.
On IND batting, well before this series IMO & the stats showed that Kohli & Pujara were the only IND new generations batsmen who seemed to have the skills to score runs overseas. So if anyone was going to make runs was going to be them.
The likes of Dhawan, Vijay, Sharma, Rahana still have quesitons marks, while Ashwin after getting some easy wickets in 2013, after ENG made him look relatively docile in 2012, notably didn't look threatening against a proper batting line-up again.
Thus in the overall assessment of IND 2014 tour assignments; 1 test down 12 to go.