Seriously, we should consider all those leagues which have been up for more than a month regardless of seasons. That'd fix all the hype.
And one more thing, I have seen that many people here and in the stories section have got the LOTM/SOTM tag for a very long time, say 3 months. We should really keep the tag up only for 3-4 months.
Well I thought when I'll leave, things will be better, but it's quite the opposite.
Anyway, I am back, and hopefully this time, I'll try to be on the safer side!
@All: Just like every other LOTM, let's treat this one as the same now. It isn't a big issue at all, and ASAP, we shall forget it. IMO, LOTM shouldn't be closed, unless we people begin treating it as a reward for the hard work and the efforts of the league manager and not as a competition.
So more or less you want some rules, that'll be the be all and end all?
e.g. any leagues that have been running for more than one month, and have had a match posted within 20 days will be considered.
I want to tell everybody that running a league is more than having a draft, making some fixtures and just simming the matches.
It is something that helps you really in the real life - managing things and bringing out innovative ideas. Some of the members don't consider bringing any innovations in their leagues, rather they run them on the same old/others' ideas. And premier leagues? Duh! Too much.
I think that it should be something like 30 days since the thread was created or 20 days since the first games. Or something like that. It has to be more than half the month at any rate.
Premier Leagues aren't original at all. But they're still fun to compete in.
Yeah. Even my other league has 2 different tournaments and then a Super Cup match between the winner of boths.
I think 'A' Championships deserves to win this month. tbh, I overlooked it mostly until Varun asked me whether I wanted a team in the future but I've had a look at it and it looks really good and has a different idea.
Or why not nominate all the active leagues?
There are hardly 10-12 of them anyway i.e. just 4-5 more nominations irrespective of how sucessful they have been and how long they have been running for (even if they finished only one match) because if they're not good enough,they won't attract votes anyway but at least there won't be any scope for complaining and alleged discrimination.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.