rickyp
International Coach
simbazz, keeping the inactives means its easier to give everyone a better go, it should work out better for you, because the 3 inactive players wont play in any team
Thanks for the faith guys. I try to post here as much as I can to support the team, so its good to know people notice. I like being entertained by Brad's dry humour whenever I pop in here - its great.aus5892 said:It won't affect whether you're in the side or not, it will only mean you get fc rather than od. I still like to have an AR in both, and duff has been here posting from the start, seems fair to keep him in, and he's always been a good player too.
cric_craze said:srry guys was busy with something and i m back now. can anyone fill me in ..
Yes... I can't even think of how much you missed.cric_craze said:srry guys was busy with something and i m back now. can anyone fill me in ..
aus5892 said:Yes... I can't even think of how much you missed.
Nothing against you or anyone, but have you been posting enough or I mean stayed active?cric_craze said:if u guys dont want me its fine wid me but just tell me
I wouldn't mind a bowler personally, to have 4 pacemen in one form, but I guess it's up to rickyp what he prefers.embi said:Well guys I'm back, just in time for the draft it looks like. Being a pure batsman, woot! However, if you guys want me to be a FM or a M pure bowler then go for it... what would be better?
aus5892 said:I wouldn't mind a bowler personally, to have 4 pacemen in one form, but I guess it's up to rickyp what he prefers.
Yeah I thought it was strange that a pure batsman would be a fast bowler. I would go Fast Medium if I were you, it would create some variety.embi said:Fair enough, I remember some comments a while back on why everyone was a Fast bowler, so I might change to pure medium bowler if noone minds