Melbourne Bitters 06/07 Team Thread

simbazz, keeping the inactives means its easier to give everyone a better go, it should work out better for you, because the 3 inactive players wont play in any team
 
srry guys was busy with something and i m back now. can anyone fill me in ..
 
Last edited:
aus5892 said:
It won't affect whether you're in the side or not, it will only mean you get fc rather than od. I still like to have an AR in both, and duff has been here posting from the start, seems fair to keep him in, and he's always been a good player too.
Thanks for the faith guys. I try to post here as much as I can to support the team, so its good to know people notice. I like being entertained by Brad's dry humour whenever I pop in here - its great. :)
 
cric_craze said:
srry guys was busy with something and i m back now. can anyone fill me in ..

We ended up losing the FC Final cause Duff got bowled around his legs in the last over...

No mate we crushed the Soakers in the Final with yours truly picking up MoM :)
 
aus5892 said:
Yes... I can't even think of how much you missed.

Flipping 'eck, you missed him so much you pushed the thought of him out of your head :rolleyes: lucky guy
 
Well guys I'm back, just in time for the draft it looks like. Being a pure batsman, woot! However, if you guys want me to be a FM or a M pure bowler then go for it... what would be better?
 
cric_craze said:
if u guys dont want me its fine wid me but just tell me
Nothing against you or anyone, but have you been posting enough or I mean stayed active?
 
embi said:
Well guys I'm back, just in time for the draft it looks like. Being a pure batsman, woot! However, if you guys want me to be a FM or a M pure bowler then go for it... what would be better?
I wouldn't mind a bowler personally, to have 4 pacemen in one form, but I guess it's up to rickyp what he prefers.
 
aus5892 said:
I wouldn't mind a bowler personally, to have 4 pacemen in one form, but I guess it's up to rickyp what he prefers.

Fair enough, I remember some comments a while back on why everyone was a Fast bowler, so I might change to pure medium bowler if noone minds :D
 
embi said:
Fair enough, I remember some comments a while back on why everyone was a Fast bowler, so I might change to pure medium bowler if noone minds :D
Yeah I thought it was strange that a pure batsman would be a fast bowler. I would go Fast Medium if I were you, it would create some variety.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top