Murali Reported for Suspect Action

J

jeromedascorp

Guest
? Wisden Cricinfo Ltd

BY Charlie Austin in Colombo

March 28, 20004

Muttiah Muralitharan has again been reported to the ICC for having a suspect action. Chris Broad, the former England batsman who is the match referee for the Test series between Sri Lanka and Australia that finished today, has reported that in his opinion the action with which Muralitharan delivers the doosra - his "wrong'un" that turns from leg to off - is not legitimate.

Ajit Jayasekara, the Sri Lankan team's administrative manager, explained: "At the start of play I was called to the match referee's office, and Chris Broad told me that he had some bad news - he would be reporting Murali for the ball that goes the other way.

"We broke the news to the team and Murali only at the end of the day's play. He was disappointed, and very down, but Murali does not think that he has a problem with his delivery."

Broad, in his official statement, clarified that he had a problem only with the doosra, and not Muralitharan's regular offspinner. "The concern is that this ball may be delivered with an action that is not in accordance with the laws of the game and accordingly I have submitted this report for further investigation. In making this report I would like to empahasis that it relates to this new delivery only."

Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) has asserted, meanwhile, that while it will work to resolve the situation, it will be supportive of Muralitharan throughout. A statement from the SLC said: "We have already initiated action in coordination with the SLC Cricket Committee and Bowling Review Group to work with Mr. Muralitharan in compliance with the process that it is in place with the ICC. Sri Lanka Cricket will vigorously support Mr. Muralitharan through this process and are confident that he will continue to play for his country and clear any doubts with regard to his bowling action."

Muralitharan's action has been the subject of endless debate over the years. He sufferes from a congenital condition that means he cannot fully straighten his elbow - but the relevant laws permit this as long as the arm stays in the same position throughout the delivery and the elbow isn't flexed.

Muralitharan was called for throwing in Australia in 1995-96, but later had his action cleared by biomechanical experts from the University of Western Australia. Significantly, however, one of those same experts recently cast doubt on the legitimacy of the doosra - a delivery Muralitharan has only mastered recently - saying that it needed investigation as it might constitute a throw.
 
I suspect only Akthar.To me he looks like a perfect chuck.
He might have been given the green signal by the ICC.But...
 
O yea, he really chucks :o :wacko: :blink: No he dosen't, you're wrong -_- <_<

If you think that he really then please prove these reportswrong. ;)

See also: this link.


I really want to know what'd you think. Please be sure that you read all the pages.
 
Murali chucks or not, he has really left a bad impression on future cricket. I read in 'The Sportstar' that most of the off-spinners in Sri Lanka, who do not have a 'bent arm' like Murali, are bowling with the same action as Murali. Why do they need to change to bowl in an orthodox manner when they can turn the ball a mile?

It just became evident in the recently concluded U-19 WC. Anybody who watched the series will remember how Pakistan Off Spinner Tariq Mahmood turned the ball and his action, especially. He is a Murali xerox in action, but the panel which was set up to monitor the actions could do nothing about Tariq, just because he has the action of one of the most successful bowlers in cricket.

P.S: His action was not even reported, to get the bio-mechanical crap.
 
Well in my opinion murali is a chucker,who's to say that when he has gone for the tests on his action he has bowled exactly the same way he does in a match.
 
I think it is just the 'other one' which is creating problem.
It happened with Harbhajan also.
 
Originally posted by indyan@Mar 29 2004, 05:09 PM
I think it is just the 'other one' which is creating problem.
It happened with Harbhajan also.
Didn't you read the article. That's the ball that is being speculated on.
 
I really hope that they can solve this problem and that murali can bowl without a bent elbow. Future generations are bowling with bent arms since they can turn it a mile and if 500+ wicket taker muli can do it, then why not everyone else? :blink:
 
:D i just want to ask u guys, have u seen a good bowler who doesnt chuck,

but maybe one ball where he is tryting to ball faster or put more strenght in it ,he acutally chucks,i have seen pakistani players in uae ,who do this ,but when we protest they will bowl with a straight arm,and no one can doubt their actions, but if does it in a middle of a over even the umpires do call no ball,

no offence to any pakistanis,we here play cricket mostly with pakistanis,so thier name came up,
 
Originally posted by jeromedascorp@Mar 29 2004, 11:44 AM
I really hope that they can solve this problem and that murali can bowl without a bent elbow. Future generations are bowling with bent arms since they can turn it a mile and if 500+ wicket taker muli can do it, then why not everyone else? :blink:
Bowling with a bent arm is not against the laws of the game.
 
Originally posted by andrew_nixon79+Mar 29 2004, 10:53 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(andrew_nixon79 @ Mar 29 2004, 10:53 PM)</div>
<!--QuoteBegin-jeromedascorp
@Mar 29 2004, 11:44 AM
I really hope that they can solve this problem and that murali can bowl without a bent elbow. Future generations are bowling with bent arms since they can turn it a mile and if 500+ wicket taker muli can do it, then why not everyone else? :blink:
Bowling with a bent arm is not against the laws of the game. [/b]
aye...if it straightens then it is a chuck
 
Once the arm bends it is very difficult to bowl without straightening it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top