Mysterious 9/11
- Thread starter McLOVIN
- Start date
Highlander999
ICC President
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Location
- London
LOL that is weird
MasterBlaster76
ICC Chairman
That is downright bizarre!
Insomniac
Title Recipient
First of all, Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1847, not 1846.
Lincoln took office in 1861 - although it says elected. Mere coincidence
John Wilkes Booth was born in 1838
And I just tried doing that with a twenty dollar bill
On the top it says The United States of America.
The only O is in OF - now how the hell does an S come after O in that?
And I tried to see the photos - there is NO RESEMBLANCE.
Total bullcrap. I'm glad it kept some of you entertained
Lincoln took office in 1861 - although it says elected. Mere coincidence
John Wilkes Booth was born in 1838
And I just tried doing that with a twenty dollar bill
On the top it says The United States of America.
The only O is in OF - now how the hell does an S come after O in that?
And I tried to see the photos - there is NO RESEMBLANCE.
Total bullcrap. I'm glad it kept some of you entertained
ste_mc_efc
Chairman of Selectors
Coincidence.
I found this post on a different forum, but is pretty insightful into the whole 9/11 debate.
"America has a history of declassified false flag attacks on its own people, from the sinking of the USS Maine to the Gulf of Tonkin "Incident" to the attack on the USS Liberty and of course, the one they decided not to run with, the proposed Operation Northwoods in the 1960s which was meant to feature airline hijackings and other terrorist attacks across the USA to be blamed on Cuba. So the fact that there is "form" for such activities amongst the American establishment should at least open our minds to the possibility that 9-11 was also such an incident.
Secondly, then neoconservatives in their PNAC document prior tom 9-11 were expressing how convenient a "second Pearl Harbor event" would be in expediting their aims of a American adventurism in Eurasia.
Thirdly, that the ruins of the twins towers was never subjected to standard forensic examination, but instead shipped abroad for disposal, and that the controversy surrounding WTC7, a building that just happened to contain some intelligence agencies field offices, continues to rage, leads many of us to ask what are they hiding?
So we have a history of fake terror from the USA government, motive for it on 9-11, and highly suspicious circumstances surrounding the disposal of evidence. And that's before we even touch on the ridiculous, such as the passport of one of the hijackers being found so conveniently intact and unsinged in the rubble, despite the inferno caused by the plane crash."
I found this post on a different forum, but is pretty insightful into the whole 9/11 debate.
"America has a history of declassified false flag attacks on its own people, from the sinking of the USS Maine to the Gulf of Tonkin "Incident" to the attack on the USS Liberty and of course, the one they decided not to run with, the proposed Operation Northwoods in the 1960s which was meant to feature airline hijackings and other terrorist attacks across the USA to be blamed on Cuba. So the fact that there is "form" for such activities amongst the American establishment should at least open our minds to the possibility that 9-11 was also such an incident.
Secondly, then neoconservatives in their PNAC document prior tom 9-11 were expressing how convenient a "second Pearl Harbor event" would be in expediting their aims of a American adventurism in Eurasia.
Thirdly, that the ruins of the twins towers was never subjected to standard forensic examination, but instead shipped abroad for disposal, and that the controversy surrounding WTC7, a building that just happened to contain some intelligence agencies field offices, continues to rage, leads many of us to ask what are they hiding?
So we have a history of fake terror from the USA government, motive for it on 9-11, and highly suspicious circumstances surrounding the disposal of evidence. And that's before we even touch on the ridiculous, such as the passport of one of the hijackers being found so conveniently intact and unsinged in the rubble, despite the inferno caused by the plane crash."
Highlander999
ICC President
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Location
- London
You can not honestly be saying that 9/11 was staged?
smssia0112
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
Of course it's a coincidence, but it's still interesting.First of all, Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1847, not 1846.
Lincoln took office in 1861 - although it says elected. Mere coincidence
John Wilkes Booth was born in 1838
And I just tried doing that with a twenty dollar bill
On the top it says The United States of America.
The only O is in OF - now how the hell does an S come after O in that?
And I tried to see the photos - there is NO RESEMBLANCE.
Total bullcrap. I'm glad it kept some of you entertained
evertonfan
Chairman of Selectors
There's a great video on youtube somewhere showing in great detail the structural explosions on various floors. It was far more than just the planes that brought them down.
I don't think it's the American government who blew them up though. The terrorists had been organising this for years in advance.
Simbazz
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2005
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Those with views on this under the age of 21, are probably not solid views. Ofcourse there are always exceptions to rules.
My belief is that America had something to do with 9/11, from the information i've been given/seen and heard. Now ofcourse, i'm not clever so i'm most certainly wrong, and i'd never argue about a 9/11 topic.
My belief is that America had something to do with 9/11, from the information i've been given/seen and heard. Now ofcourse, i'm not clever so i'm most certainly wrong, and i'd never argue about a 9/11 topic.
Highlander999
ICC President
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Location
- London
OOOHHH, I know that it shouldn't be funny but it does have a few classic lines
"Shave your beard if your brown and you'd best salute the crown or they'll do you like Brazilians and shoot your arse down."
Highlander999 added 1 Minutes and 20 Seconds later...
Yeah I saw it last night
Bring it up in the next podcast
"Shave your beard if your brown and you'd best salute the crown or they'll do you like Brazilians and shoot your arse down."
Highlander999 added 1 Minutes and 20 Seconds later...
Yeah I saw it last night
Bring it up in the next podcast
I'm disappointed, Matt. I always thought you had more intelligence than to believe conspiracy rubbish like this. We've been over this so many times, the theories hold no weight in water, yet people still believe them.
Mind your back for the gunman on the grassy knoll.
Pathetic. Thanks to zMario for pointing out the false stats in the theory. Nice to know some people have a modicum of common sense. Disrespectful to the 3,000 who died. As bad as decimating gravestones.
I should point out that I'd happily defunct all the rubbish about their being explosives on the various floors (it's called gas-pipes btw), but I know it would be like to talking to a brick wall, so I shall save my fingers.
ste_mc_efc
Chairman of Selectors
I don't think people searching for the truth about an incident is being disrespectful to those that died in the incident at all. Far from it in fact. Providing their motives are pure, of course.
