Planetcricket Awards 2006 **NOMINATIONS**

Status
Not open for further replies.
usy said:
Guys I was just looking at the C2004 forums I found a great download thread so..

Nominate:
Best download thread - Kev's Graphics Thread (C2004)

I'll second that.Some of the work done by Kev for Cricket 2004 when everyone else has shifted to the latest games in commendable.His quality and quantity of patches must never be underated.
 
Good luck to all who are nominated. :clap :)

My nomination would have to go to cricket_doctor for the outstanding patch! And of course, to all those who are always trying to make PC an awesome place! You're succeeding!
 
Hmm...you know I said that the "Most Improved Member" category needed a bit of beefing up? Well I've just found a member who could fit in there - Virender Sehwag. I remember when he first came here he was a little misunderstood... but now he is a worthwhile member of the community.
He joined late February, but come on, the category does need more nominees...
 
embi said:
Hmm...you know I said that the "Most Improved Member" category needed a bit of beefing up? Well I've just found a member who could fit in there - Virender Sehwag. I remember when he first came here he was a little misunderstood... but now he is a worthwhile member of the community.
He joined late February, but come on, the category does need more nominees...

he wasn't banned.Was he?

Only prev banned people compete in that catagory.
 
kuttakumar said:
I am nominating Lucky in the best improved member.

Once again, was he actually banned? I'm genuinely asking this question, as I wasn't here when he initially signed up..
 
No, I'm fine thanks; I was just wondering, as that is the criteria for being nominated in the 'Most Improved Member' category, isn't it...
 
James219 said:
No, I'm fine thanks; I was just wondering, as that is the criteria for being nominated as 'Most Improved Member', isn't it...

sylvester (global Mod aussie1st) told me that those people who had been previously banned but now show great improvement are eligible.

And I think that someone should specify indivisual conditions for the catagories in the first post itself.
 
I dont think that a ban would be the criteria,although I might be wrong.Probably those in general whose behaviour was questionable to start off with(received warnings,put on mod preview perhaps) and they have improved thereafter.

As for youngest member,I think the criteria for age is 15,but that doesnt mean everyone under 15 will be chosen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top