OK, we had 3 entries.
Entry 1 - Arghasen
Colour: 5 - Could have used a bit more. Too much grey.
Font: 10 - Not bad, but there are plenty more fonts to choose from.
Images: 18 - Very good, exactly what you wanted
Designs: 10 - The white strip is a good element, if only you'd stuck to it!
Overall: 43. A pretty average sig. Good choice of images and the animation works. Would be looking much better if you had used a bit more colour. And a side note, didn't detract from your marks but the image quality (or lack of it) was noticeable. Not that much, but these things matter. I would suggest exporting to .PNG in your image program.
Entry 2 - RabbleRouser
Colour: 18 - The thing in the background isn't quite clear, but it seems to work.
Font: 17 - Good choice of font, and I like the way you have used transparency.
Images: 16 - Two decent images, all you needed.
Designs: 14 - Its a pretty good design,does the job
Overall: 65. An excellent sig, would be proud of that. The way you have used images and font work well. The only slight discrepancy is the background. What exactly is it? Seems to work anyway. This sig is a good example that animation doesn't always make a good sig.
Entry 3 - showhimmymotto
Colour: 14 - Enough, but you could have used a bit more.
Font: 18 - Great uses of font.
Images: 12 - Unfortunately you've squashed them to make them fit
Designs: 18 - Good placement of all the England stuff around the edges with the pics in the middle, works a treat.
Overall: 62. Another excellent sig, rivalling RabbleRouser. The design was excellent and its only let down by those 2 squashed images...(not a huge amount but noticeable).
Overall the quality of the sigs was excellent. A few points here and there, but you can't get a perfect sig, can you? Another note, it does make it easier to judge if you upload your images to imageshack (see the option on new post above attachments).
Well done you 3 three for entering, hopefully there will be a bit more competition next week.