Prithvi
10 years at Planetcricket
Yay we won \m/ 
.
When I and TSP (@Baahubali) were discussing about line up on Facebook, I was like, bring in MS, in place of CJ, seeing his FC form. But later it was TSP, the master mind, reminded me that form won't continue across the formats, and hence he would be playing CJ. And what a memorable day for him. Getting both the openers in the same over and then a crucial 32 off 44. I'm very happy for CJ. Its brilliant to see Muttiaih show the world what he is famous for. I'm a bit disappointed with my performance with the ball, however take a bow TSP- the man behind this victory. Every time I though we were out of the contest, TSP made it look possible. Great to be off the mark in this format as well.
Vaibhav: 10 overs, 1-46 runs. Nandu: 8.3 overs, 2-45, Mohammad Tauqir: 10 overs, 0-59, Yourself 10 overs, 59 runs.
Overall: 38.3 overs (213 balls), 205 runs.
If you sarcastically mean a "poor" bowling lineup, with this kind of performance, then its probably your poor analysis of cricket. The other two bowlers, who are the part time bowlers and you cannot expect them to bowl with 2 runs per over economy on the kind of surface where 600 odd runs have been scored in something negligibly lesser than 100 overs. No team has all 6 specialist bowlers who can bowl with economy of 3 per over and get a wicket in each over consistently.
.
.When I and TSP (@Baahubali) were discussing about line up on Facebook, I was like, bring in MS, in place of CJ, seeing his FC form. But later it was TSP, the master mind, reminded me that form won't continue across the formats, and hence he would be playing CJ. And what a memorable day for him. Getting both the openers in the same over and then a crucial 32 off 44. I'm very happy for CJ. Its brilliant to see Muttiaih show the world what he is famous for. I'm a bit disappointed with my performance with the ball, however take a bow TSP- the man behind this victory. Every time I though we were out of the contest, TSP made it look possible. Great to be off the mark in this format as well.
HTML:
PHOENIX AMIGOS Bowling
Player Overs Mdns Runs Wkts E/R Wds NBs
Nandu Chelackal 8.3 0 45 2 5.29 0 0
Vaibhav Tewatia 10.0 0 46 1 4.60 2 2
Untouchables 666 6.0 0 46 1 7.67 0 2
Sunibir Das 4.0 0 37 1 9.25 0 1
Mohammad Tauqir 10.0 0 55 2 5.50 0 2
Navin Gandhi 10.0 0 59 0 5.90 0 0
EXTRAS Wides: 2 No Balls: 7 Leg Byes: 3 Byes: 16
Total: 307/8 Overs: 48.3 Run Rate: 6.33 Extras: 28Vaibhav: 10 overs, 1-46 runs. Nandu: 8.3 overs, 2-45, Mohammad Tauqir: 10 overs, 0-59, Yourself 10 overs, 59 runs.
Overall: 38.3 overs (213 balls), 205 runs.
If you sarcastically mean a "poor" bowling lineup, with this kind of performance, then its probably your poor analysis of cricket. The other two bowlers, who are the part time bowlers and you cannot expect them to bowl with 2 runs per over economy on the kind of surface where 600 odd runs have been scored in something negligibly lesser than 100 overs. No team has all 6 specialist bowlers who can bowl with economy of 3 per over and get a wicket in each over consistently.
Who is this Untouchables 666? Someone else wearing his jersey?This is what happens to a team when Captains of a team just take decisions on their own without even discussing with fellow mates, I really miss Untouchable in my team
Perfect example of "just commenting something rubbish to defend the duck and uneconomical spell" without even knowing who played the match
.You were equally balanced, sir. Poor that you cannot feel your own team's balance and a player from opposition is able to. To be frank, you had the advantage after getting Haydos very early. You had quick wickets too. Thank you for your kind gesture of congratulating us and wishing us good luck. As a token for this, I would like to give you an advice. You may or may not follow it, that is left to you.
If you have problems with your management, you shouldn't be playing. Settle your issues with your management first.
.
!
, The great part is even none of my management people cared to comment on this. 
