Shane Watson or Murali Vijay??

Status
Not open for further replies.
Murali Vijay doesn't even have a test half-century yet, so Watson is easily better than him in Tests.

In T20 I'll again go with Watson since he has better average.
 
Last edited:
Shane Watson. He's a class act. Murali Vijay is still finding his feet in International cricket. In a couple of years, he can be one of the best players in the world, I say :)
 
Watson is a world class all-rounder whilst Vijay hasn't even done anything, even in domestic level, either in batting or bowling :doh

I mean seriously wtf???
 
Ha, way to miss the sarcasm. It's a dig at the Gautam Gambhir vs Phil Hughes thread... :sarcasm
 
Wherever any Cricket Thread comes up There comes up a topic about SACHIN TENDULKAR which is unnecessary in my opinion.Just try and reply to the title of the thread instead of bringing Sachin into everything.

@ the topic: Watson would be the choice as Murali hasn't played much International Cricket
 
WTF ? Stupid comparision.

Request the mods to close this thread as it totally meaningless.

On one side we have an established player whereas on the other, we have someone who just tends to fill in when needed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top