Shaun Tait or Lasith Malinga

[age of the fall]

Good bowling at 150K> Crap bowling at 160K.

 

[sami ullah khan]

Good bowling at 150K> Crap bowling at 160K.

Malinga hardly ever touches 150 K. But I was more talking about the thrill of it rather than effectiveness.

 

[Mike23]

Tough pick but i'd go with Malinga (not being biased at all). I like Tait but he is far too inconsistent.

Mike23 added 3 Minutes and 48 Seconds later...

Shaun Tait, reason being, he can bowl at 160 KPH

You can't be serious? You picked him because he bowls at around about 160? Pace isn't always the answer tbh. Look at someone like Vaas who bowl's at around the mid 120s he is far more effective than Tait or Malinga for that matter.

 

[ahmed shah]

i would say malinga because he is more consistant then tait

 

[Dare]

Shaun Tait, reason being, he can bowl at 160 KPH

In Australia on fast and bouncy pitch. In only one over in one 20/20.

 

[drainpipe32]

Sour loser?

 

[pcfan123]

Id pick Malinga because I want my bowlers to bowl more than 6 deliveries accurately

 

[Bhargav]

Shaun Tait for me...he is improving a lot...

 

[TumTum]

Shaun Tait for me...he is improving a lot...

The other way.

 

[hacker]

definitely lasith malinga. he is becoming one of the world best fast bowler. tait is a good bowler too

 

[soumya]

Malinga's yorkers rule!

 

[sivaprasad183]

i opt malinga.. for he very consistent in the shorter versions compared to tait..

 

[johny]

lasith malinga.. considering his beautiful variationa nd yorkers

and most importantly.. his fitness


tait couldnt bowl any more than 2 ove rspells in the 3rd odi against england

 

[War]

Malinga slightly. But i enjoy watching Tait bowl more & i reckon international batsmen find Tait (when bowling in top form) a bit more difficult to face than Malinga as well.

 

[pcfan123]

^ Tait is more fun to watch but Id rather have Malinga on my team.

Tait can only bowl 2-3 over spells and that is pretty much useless in the real formats of the game.