Signatures

Can we please have larger sig sizes? For a pretty experienced GFX user now, i have come to know now that 300x100 is very small. I would greatly appreciate it if the staff took into consideration larger sig size limit-500x200.
Its not even THAT big anyways..
 
Can we please have larger sig sizes? For a pretty experienced GFX user now, i have come to know now that 300x100 is very small. I would greatly appreciate it if the staff took into consideration larger sig size limit-500x200.
Its not even THAT big anyways..
I disagree. Signatures that are 500x200 pixels in size would take very long to be processed with a dial-up internet connection and make the forums look untidy.
Thankfully, with the current rules, it is not as easy to use annoying and ugly animated graphics.
The quality of a post should be focused on.
 
Can we please have larger sig sizes? For a pretty experienced GFX user now, i have come to know now that 300x100 is very small. I would greatly appreciate it if the staff took into consideration larger sig size limit-500x200.
Its not even THAT big anyways..

PlanetCricket Staff would prefer it if forum members would concentrate on the quality of their posts, not the quality of their signatures.

If you're an experienced graphics maker, look on the limits as a challenge. How creative can you be with such a small canvas?
 
With this new system can we have two images in a sig? ex. A sig and a user bar (300x100 total size)

You can only have one signature picture at a time.
A good way to have both a picture and a userbar would be to put them together in Photoshop. Even I could do it, and I'm useless at it!
 
Nice stuff guys, getting use to this now ;).
 
I would like to know, why can't we have sig's over 300X100?

Is it due to people's internet connection?
 
Because 300X100 is ample. Forums where members have big signatures look awful and out of place.
 
I agree with Madman maybe 350x100??
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top