I would say that at the moment, ZexyZahid has more reliability than you do.
I'm not sure what is more disgraceful at the moment, Pakistan spot-fixing whilst others have been suspended and their country flooded. Or the ECB thinking it's somehow alright for the tour to continue after MORE ALLEGATIONS.
It's an ODI, and it's Pakistan.
Assuming all the other games haven't been fixed, Pakistan's innings usually go like this:
First 10 overs, lose 2-3 wickets, and score 40ish runs (we scored about 30).
Then the next 10-20 overs, Pakistan rebuild and lose 1 wicket usually.
Then the last 20 overs, Pakistan try to get a big total.
It doesn't take a bookie to figure that out. What I'm saying is, there wasn't anything 'shocking' in this game - except a maiden over played by Umar Gul towards the end of the innings, but he was genuinely missing balls.
So suppousedly there's a sample of 2 overs that fit in with the 'prediction' - while the others didn't come true.
Now let's talk about overs 39 and 40 - which are suppousedly the 2 in question as stated by the Daily Telegraph.
In over 39, 5 runs were scored off of Yardy. Sounds reasonable.
In over 40, only 2 runs were scored - it was the over which involved the bizarre run out of Afridi. Now Afridi is the greatest cricket player alive, but I do not think he is capable of engineering that wicket. Razzaq had 10 overs to play with, and if he got out, we'd have been doomed. But he played 2 dot balls, then took a single, and Umar Gul played the last ball of the over for a dot. I fail to see any 'fixing' going on, other than hearsay.
England's innings is more suspect in all actuality, having lost 5 wickets for just 17 runs.