Tendulkar v Inzamam TEST CRICKET ONLY

[Karachi Xpress]

Nor inzi can score 39 centuries...

The title says that this thread is only for Test Cricket:

 

[SciD]

The title says that this thread is only for Test Cricket:

Thats his Test century tally. He has close to 50 centuries in ODIS.

 

[shravi]

The title says that this thread is only for Test Cricket:

Sorry to burst your bubble but Sachin Tendulkar has 39 centuries in test cricket . He has 42 in ODI cricket.

pwnz0rd

 

[Karachi Xpress]

Thats his Test century tally. He has close to 50 centuries in ODIS.

Sorry to burst your bubble but Sachin Tendulkar has 39 centuries in test cricket . He has 42 in ODI cricket.

pwnz0rd

My bad

 

[shan111]

The title says that this thread is only for Test Cricket:

I know that.

 

[Insomniac]

And guess what?

Out of 39 100s, only 13 have come in an Indian win. PWNZ0RED!

Compared to Inzamam's 25 100s, 17 have come in a Pakistani win. PWNZ0RED!

So, if Sachin scores a 100, India have a 33% chance of winning.

If Inzamam scores a 100, Pakistan have a 68% chance of winning.

Lets take that to drawn games as well.

If Sachin scores a 100, India have a 76% chance to win OR draw.

If Inzamam scores a 100, Pakistan have a 92% chance to win or draw.

I believe I just PwnZ0red some people.

 

[metallics2006]

A lot of people have posted the same stats again and again about why Inzy is better than Sachin in tests. So we will just see what Sachin is better at than Inzy in test cricket over the complete length of their entire carrers(NO REPLIES IN BOLD PLEASE).

In All Home Tests : Sachin Better than Inzy
SRT- 5056 runs Avg-54.95
IUH- 3709 runs Avg-53.75
SRT stats page : http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...home_or_away=1;template=results;type=allround

Inzy stats page : http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...home_or_away=1;template=results;type=allround

In Away Tests : Sachin Is Better Than Inzy
SRT- 6821 runs Avg-53.70
IUH- 4821 runs Avg-45.91

I personally love this :happy. The main point of a certain poster's arguement has been how Inzamam has batted with with a lot of people and has taken the team to victories many times.So,

Partnership Analysis(qualification 1000 runs together as partners)

Sachin:
& Dravid-5265 runs @ 52.12
& Ganguly-3990 runs @ 61.38
& Azharudin-2385 @ 58.17
& Laxman-2015 @53.02
& Sidhu-1245 @ 77.81
& Sehwag-1062 @ 75.85

Link :http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...emplate=results;type=batting;view=fow_summary

Inzy:
& Yousuf-3013 @ 56.84
& Ijaz Ahmed-1717 @ 61.32
& Younis Khan-1652 & 53.29

Link : http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...emplate=results;type=batting;view=fow_summary

So its no use from now talking about the heroics of how Inzy took Pak to more victories by leading from the front more than Sachin.

One interesting point. Inzy has played more tests against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe than Sachin but averages lesser than him IN WINNING GAMES.

Sachin :
Vs Bangladesh -4 matches 424 runs @ 212.00
Vs Zimbabwe -5 matches 587 runs @ 83.85

Inzy :
Vs Bangladesh-6 matches 404 runs @ 80.80
Vs Zimbabwe-7 matches 546 runs @ 49.63

If he is better than Sachin why did'nt he score more than SRT though he played more matches against them? Someone did not include Bangladesh and Zimbabwe in stats knowing Inzy will be exposed.

I gathered this in 20 minutes. It wont take a person who is willing to go through records to prove a lot more things. I will let the viewers decide for themselves who is the better batsman.

 

[aditya123]

Hahahahaha at least Inzi doesn't get out on 99 like 100 times in a year

You make such nonsensical comments which show how little insight you can provide on this topic.
I would settle for a player who scores ten 90s in a year to someone who scores 2 hundreds and then does not manage much.
That actually shows you the consistency !

aditya123 added 6 Minutes and 1 Seconds later...

Hahahahaha at least Inzi doesn't get out on 99 like 100 times in a year

The title says that this thread is only for Test Cricket:

Two of the most hillarious posts ! One which says scoring a hundred 99s in a year is bad while the other shows a lack of knowledge of the current test match record of centuries.

And guess what,both the posters have been arguing for Inzy !

 

[Karachi Xpress]

Two of the most hillarious posts ! One which says scoring a hundred 99s in a year is bad while the other shows a lack of knowledge of the current test match record of centuries.

And guess what,both the posters have been arguing for Inzy !

And guess what...you have lack of knowledge about humans...everybody makes a mistake

 

[Deleted member 9102]

Edit: Chris Gayle

 

[aditya123]

And guess what...you have lack of knowledge about humans...everybody makes a mistake

But you would expect someone who is arguing against Tendulkar to at least know the number of centuries he has scored.At least after 40-odd pages of debate.

 

[Master Khan]

I think both are great players but I think Inzaman is a match winner and a great captain for Pakistan.
He has help Pakistan win many matchs and he has scored past 250 and 300 in test match which tendulkar have score in about 150 test matchs.
tendulkar have scores alot of runs because he is a opener.

so I think inzi is better tbh

 

[shravi]

Sachin does not open in test matches.

 

[Insomniac]

A lot of people have posted the same stats again and again about why Inzy is better than Sachin in tests. So we will just see what Sachin is better at than Inzy in test cricket over the complete length of their entire carrers(NO REPLIES IN BOLD PLEASE).

In All Home Tests : Sachin Better than Inzy
SRT- 5056 runs Avg-54.95
IUH- 3709 runs Avg-53.75
SRT stats page : http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...home_or_away=1;template=results;type=allround

Once again, how many of Sachin's runs have come in winning situations? Besides, on India's flat decks, anyone can score runs

Inzy stats page : http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...home_or_away=1;template=results;type=allround

In Away Tests : Sachin Is Better Than Inzy
SRT- 6821 runs Avg-53.70
IUH- 4821 runs Avg-45.91

And once again, how many of Sachin's runs come in a win?

I personally love this :happy. The main point of a certain poster's arguement has been how Inzamam has batted with with a lot of people and has taken the team to victories many times.So,

Exactly, he has batted with many people, who he will probably not have 1000 runs with Inzamam. You have just answered your own question, now let me do my stats.

Inzamam Partnership Analysis (qualifcation 500 runs together)

Inzamam:
& Afridi- 602 runs at 86.00
& Taufeeq - 674 runs at 67.40
& Ijaz Ahmed - 1717 runs at 61.32
& Mohammad Yousuf - 3013 runs at 56.84
& Aamer Sohail - 680 runs at 56.66
& Saleem Malik - 976 at 54.22
& Younis Khan - 1652 at 53.29

But honestly, what does this prove, other than Inzamam had to bat with more partners in his career than Tendulkar?

http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...emplate=results;type=batting;view=fow_summary

Partnership Analysis(qualification 1000 runs together as partners)

Sachin:
& Dravid-5265 runs @ 52.12
& Ganguly-3990 runs @ 61.38
& Azharudin-2385 @ 58.17
& Laxman-2015 @53.02
& Sidhu-1245 @ 77.81
& Sehwag-1062 @ 75.85

Link :http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...emplate=results;type=batting;view=fow_summary

Inzy:
& Yousuf-3013 @ 56.84
& Ijaz Ahmed-1717 @ 61.32
& Younis Khan-1652 & 53.29

Link : http://stats.cricinfo.com/statsguru...emplate=results;type=batting;view=fow_summary

So its no use from now talking about the heroics of how Inzy took Pak to more victories by leading from the front more than Sachin.
I don't get your point? You just yourself proved that Inzamam had to deal with more batting partners in the order than Tendulkar

One interesting point. Inzy has played more tests against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe than Sachin but averages lesser than him IN WINNING GAMES.

Sachin :
Vs Bangladesh -4 matches 424 runs @ 212.00
Vs Zimbabwe -5 matches 587 runs @ 83.85

Inzy :
Vs Bangladesh-6 matches 404 runs @ 80.80
Vs Zimbabwe-7 matches 546 runs @ 49.63

If he is better than Sachin why did'nt he score more than SRT though he played more matches against them? Someone did not include Bangladesh and Zimbabwe in stats knowing Inzy will be exposed.

I ALWAYS included Bangladesh and Zimbabwe in EVERY stat, except for the man of the match awards. When I included Bangladesh and Zimbabwe in the man of the match awards, Inzamam had 7 MoMs, and 3 Man of Series, and Sachin only had 2 MoMs and 1 Man of Series (in winning matches/series)

And still, with Bangladesh and Zimbabwe included, Sachin has not received a man of the match in a winning situation for ten years.

That is the only stat that did not include Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, but when it was included, it ridiculed Sachin even more.
I gathered this in 20 minutes. It wont take a person who is willing to go through records to prove a lot more things. I will let the viewers decide for themselves who is the better batsman.

Yes, let the viewers decide,

Especially with this statistic

Out of 39 100s, only 13 have come in an Indian win. PWNZ0RED!

Compared to Inzamam's 25 100s, 17 have come in a Pakistani win. PWNZ0RED!

So, if Sachin scores a 100, India have a 33% chance of winning.

If Inzamam scores a 100, Pakistan have a 68% chance of winning.

Lets take that to drawn games as well.

If Sachin scores a 100, India have a 76% chance to win OR draw.

If Inzamam scores a 100, Pakistan have a 92% chance to win or draw.

I believe I just PwnZ0red some people.


Reposted, so metallics doesn't try to avoid it.

 

[Deleted member 9102]

Edit: Chris Gayle