surendar
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2006
- Location
- Bentonville, US
- Profile Flag
- India
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Xbox One
I find the bolded part interesting. Buffalo Bill was in found in Ohio by Clarice. This to me suggests maybe Crawford was sane, and that means perhaps the two-cop theory doesn't work, as for that, the write-up should have mentioned that Crawford was in Illinois. This suggests maybe Clarice isn't in the game, as Crawford knows what he's doing?
This means, I am with wrong target and that is why Clarice isn't mentioned on the spot. Which is true, because my target for investigation was PS last night.
Clarice is not a fake claim, we have had successive day write ups mentioning her as investigator.
Day 1 - If she has to enter the mind of killer, she has to challenge the madman.
Day 2 - You know, I have met a lot of detectives, but I must say I can't ever remember one as attractive.
So it would be waste of time to even think about Clarice being a fake claim or not existing one.
What do you think of doc having a mafia's name? I find it really hard to believe that name would be shared to another person if I investigate correct target. Doc getting the information at ease is of no use, in terms of game play.
What is Chilton going to do with Killer's name unless he opts to protect the killer knowing that I have investigated lector? I definitely find it very fishy.
----------
ETA substitute Bill/Lector for any of the "safe" claims to get who could be working together. For example Clare Martin could be a fake claim for Bill. Barney for Hannibal etc
This is the first point of yours that I agree. Barney is one of the safest bets that we really don't know whether it is fake claim or not. Agreed.