General Chat TPCL 3.0 | General Chat

Overconfidence is never good. We never know how the simulator would behave. The Mavericks were the most trolled team last season and they nearly ended up winning all 3 tournaments had it not been for that Super over loss to the Lannisters(now Bad Boys).

Also I am a season's performance due being benched for most of the matches last season. In case I will outbowl you then you'll have to look back to your post of this. ;)
You have plenty learn yet.

Also Mavericks may have won something last season, that was last season, its the past, you need to move on, Mavericks need to move on.

You really think this is about a simulator? We attack on all fronts, off and on the field.

This aint a battle playboy but a war, and it ends only when all debts are paid.
 
You have plenty learn yet.

Also Mavericks may have won something last season, that was last season, its the past, you need to move on, Mavericks need to move on.

You really think this is about a simulator? We attack on all fronts, off and on the field.

This aint a battle playboy but a war, and it ends only when all debts are paid.
If you call a sport as a war then you need to grow up!!!!!

Also I don't need to learn from someone. I have my own views and opinions. Well anyways you can have your own views so I would end this over here.
 
Just in case some are wondering why The Royal Mavericks performed so well:
They (don't want to name the individual) found a loophole in the rating system that allowed their two star bowlers to be rated higher by making them Medium paced bowlers.
But their batting also made a difference from the rest. I would say that was rather a tactical move by them. Teams should have conduct an R&D on regular basis if they want to perform better on a consistent basis.
 
Just in case some are wondering why The Royal Mavericks performed so well:
They (don't want to name the individual) found a loophole in the rating system that allowed their two star bowlers to be rated higher by making them Medium paced bowlers.
Why do you think their thread is more quite than others?

They are busy finding loopholes this time around as well :p
 
Just in case some are wondering why The Royal Mavericks performed so well:
They (don't want to name the individual) found a loophole in the rating system that allowed their two star bowlers to be rated higher by making them Medium paced bowlers.
Is that taken into consideration this time around while rating the players? I see there are Medium Paced bowlers in their team this time too.
 
Genuine bowlers are all rated the same this time round unless they are a specialist player in a specific format. In which case they'll be rated slightly better.
What about bowling ar or genuine ar who opted for being specialist
 
Just in case some are wondering why The Royal Mavericks performed so well:
They (don't want to name the individual) found a loophole in the rating system that allowed their two star bowlers to be rated higher by making them Medium paced bowlers.
I thought the ratings would be fast > fast medium > medium, because the fast bowlers needed more points than fast medium bowlers and so on
 
I thought the ratings would be fast > fast medium > medium, because the fast bowlers needed more points than fast medium bowlers and so on
Ratings were given according to the stars.

So a Fast would have 4 stars
Fast med 5 stars
Medium 6 stars
 
What about bowling ar or genuine ar who opted for being specialist
All player types are rated exactly the same unless the player is a specialist player which will be rated slightly better.
I thought the ratings would be fast > fast medium > medium, because the fast bowlers needed more points than fast medium bowlers and so on
I thought the ratings would be fast > fast medium > medium, because the fast bowlers needed more points than fast medium bowlers and so on
Remember we used the skill point system last season? The higher the skill points the higher the rating. Hence we decided to go this route this time around.
 
Remember we used the skill point system last season? The higher the skill points the higher the rating.
Yeah, I know, but if you wanted to be a fast bowler, you needed more skill points than a medium pacer, so if a fast bowler and a medium pacer had the same stars, the fast bowler should've been rated better
 
Yeah, I know, but if you wanted to be a fast bowler, you needed more skill points than a medium pacer, so if a fast bowler and a medium pacer had the same stars, the fast bowler should've been rated better
You will get less stars if you wish to become a fast bowler. Similarly less stars to become an opener. It was a sacrifice of less stars to gain such a role.

Because fast bowlers get more wickets even if they get a little less skills. And openers get to bat a lot more than others even with a little less stars a lot of people were ready to make that sacrifice
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top